Honor's Play and X series represent distinct approaches to the smartphone market. The Play6T focuses on delivering essential features at an accessible price point, while the X50 GT aims to bridge the gap between mid-range affordability and flagship-level performance. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on their chipsets, charging capabilities, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the Honor Play6T offers a compelling value proposition. However, the Honor X50 GT, powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, is the clear winner for demanding users who prioritize gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing, despite a higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue | Black, Silver |
| Models | CMA-AN40 | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Honor Play6T
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for everyday tasks
- Decent battery life for light usage
- Significantly slower processor
- Limited gaming performance
- Slower charging speed
Honor X50 GT
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster 35W charging with reverse charging support
- Superior gaming and multitasking capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While specific display details (resolution, panel type) are missing, the core difference lies in the processing power driving the visuals. Both phones likely utilize LCD panels given their price points, but the X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will render graphics and UI elements with significantly greater fluidity. The Play6T’s Dimensity 700, while capable, will exhibit more noticeable frame drops in graphically intensive applications. Expect the X50 GT to handle high refresh rate content more smoothly, if supported.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the X50 GT’s more powerful processor enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s, allowing for faster image capture and improved low-light performance. While both phones may feature similar megapixel counts, the X50 GT will likely produce higher-quality images and videos due to its superior processing capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Honor X50 GT’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Play6T’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores, offering a massive leap in CPU and GPU performance. The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 and A55 cores are less efficient and deliver lower peak performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the X50 GT. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Honor X50 GT’s 35W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Play6T’s 22.5W charging. This faster charging speed will significantly reduce the time it takes to replenish the battery, offering greater convenience. The X50 GT also includes 7.5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices, a feature absent on the Play6T. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s improved efficiency may offset a potentially smaller battery size in the X50 GT, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play6T if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer a significantly faster processor for demanding games, video editing, or heavy multitasking, and are willing to pay a premium for that performance boost and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X50 GT get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is efficient, it can still generate heat under sustained load. However, the 4nm process node and Honor’s thermal management system should mitigate throttling, providing consistent performance for longer periods compared to the Dimensity 700 in the Play6T.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 noticeable for everyday apps like social media and web browsing?
For basic tasks, the difference won't be dramatic. Both phones will handle these apps smoothly. However, the X50 GT will exhibit faster app loading times and snappier transitions, even in everyday use, due to its significantly more powerful processor.
❓ Does the Honor X50 GT support high frame rate gaming (90fps or 120fps) in popular titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of supporting high frame rates in most mobile games. Whether the X50 GT specifically supports 90fps or 120fps in PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile will depend on the game's settings and optimization, but it has the hardware to deliver a smooth, high-refresh-rate gaming experience.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Honor X50 GT with the 35W charger compared to the Play6T's 22.5W charger?
The X50 GT will charge significantly faster. Expect a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes with the 35W charger, while the Play6T will likely take 90-120 minutes with its 22.5W charger. This difference is particularly noticeable when you need a quick top-up before heading out.
