Honor's Play and X series represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market. The Play6T Pro focuses on a balanced experience with a known chipset, while the X40 GT Racing aims for a more performance-oriented profile, particularly around charging speed. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing consistent performance and a proven track record, the Honor Play6T Pro offers a solid foundation. However, the Honor X40 GT Racing emerges as the winner for those who value significantly faster charging and are willing to accept the ambiguity around its CPU specifications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 07 | 2023, September 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 13 | Available. Released 2023, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 144Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | - |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 66W wired, 90% in 30 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gold | Black, Silver |
| Models | TFY-AN40 | - |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Honor Play6T Pro
- Known and reliable Dimensity 810 chipset
- Efficient 6nm process node
- 44W fast charging
- Charging speed is slower than the X40 GT Racing
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Significantly faster 66W charging (90% in 30 min)
- Includes 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher refresh rate display (inferred from 'GT Racing' branding)
- CPU specifications are vague
- Performance is uncertain without CPU details
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, making a direct comparison impossible. However, given the market positioning, we can infer the Play6T Pro likely features a standard LCD panel, while the 'GT Racing' moniker suggests the X40 GT Racing may incorporate a higher refresh rate display (potentially 90Hz or 120Hz) to enhance the gaming experience. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely be superior on the X40 GT Racing if it utilizes a more advanced panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is difficult. It's reasonable to assume both phones feature multi-camera setups, but the image quality will hinge on the quality of the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device.
Performance
The Honor Play6T Pro is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a Cortex-A76 based prime core clocked at 2.4GHz. This provides a known performance baseline. The X40 GT Racing only lists an 'octa-core' CPU, lacking specific core details or clock speeds. While both are octa-core, the Dimensity 810's architecture is defined, offering predictable performance in gaming and multitasking. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 810 also contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to potentially older or less efficient nodes used in the X40 GT Racing's CPU. The X40 GT Racing's performance will depend heavily on the specific CPU model, which remains unknown.
Battery Life
The most significant difference lies in charging speed. The Honor Play6T Pro supports 44W wired charging, while the X40 GT Racing boasts 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 90% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a substantial advantage for the X40 GT Racing, catering to users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The X40 GT Racing also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Play6T Pro, allowing it to charge other devices. Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but the faster charging of the X40 GT Racing mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play6T Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with a well-understood chipset (Dimensity 810) and a respectable 44W charging solution. It's ideal for users who prioritize stability and don't demand the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Honor X40 GT Racing if you prefer a phone that can rapidly replenish its battery with 66W charging, offering a 90% charge in just 30 minutes, and are comfortable with a less-detailed CPU specification.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the X40 GT Racing compared to the 44W charging on the Play6T Pro in real-world use?
The 66W charging on the X40 GT Racing will significantly reduce charging times. While a full 0-100% time isn't specified, the stated 90% charge in 30 minutes indicates a much quicker top-up compared to the Play6T Pro's 44W, which will likely take closer to an hour for a full charge. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Does the lack of specific CPU details for the X40 GT Racing mean it will perform worse than the Play6T Pro?
Not necessarily, but it introduces uncertainty. The Dimensity 810 in the Play6T Pro is a known quantity. The X40 GT Racing's CPU *could* be more powerful, but without knowing the core configuration and clock speeds, it's impossible to say. The 'GT Racing' branding suggests a focus on performance, but that doesn't guarantee a superior CPU.
❓ Is the 5W reverse wired charging on the X40 GT Racing useful for everyday scenarios?
While 5W is relatively slow, the reverse wired charging on the X40 GT Racing can be a lifesaver for charging accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch in a pinch. It's not a replacement for a dedicated charger, but it offers a convenient emergency charging solution.
