The Honor Play6C and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10x emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Play6C’s Snapdragon 480+. Crucially, the K10x’s 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who prioritize convenience and quick power-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 13 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Blue, Black |
| Models | VNE-AN40 | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Honor Play6C
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic tasks
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480+ chipset
- Slower 22.5W charging
- Likely limited camera performance
Oppo K10x
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Improved performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially higher price
- May not have a dramatically superior camera
- Still a budget-focused device
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic existence of a display. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. However, the lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or refresh rates. The absence of details suggests neither phone is aiming for display excellence, focusing instead on core functionality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light conditions. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Oppo’s typically leaning towards vibrant, social media-friendly results, while Honor’s may aim for more natural tones. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear advantage over the Honor Play6C’s Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). The 6nm node translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the 695 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. The K10x’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – also represents a step up from the Play6C’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460. This means the K10x will handle demanding apps and multitasking with greater ease, offering a smoother user experience. While both support 5G, the 695’s modem is likely more refined, potentially leading to better signal reception and data speeds.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. The ability to reach 80% charge in just 33 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Honor Play6C’s 22.5W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the K10x’s more efficient chipset and faster charging effectively mitigate any potential capacity disadvantage. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly appreciate the K10x’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play6C if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a suitable option for basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if rapid charging is a must-have feature. The K10x is geared towards users who demand more from their smartphone without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The 6nm process and improved CPU/GPU architecture compared to the Play6C’s Snapdragon 480+ will result in fewer frame drops and better thermal management during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 22.5W charging on the Honor Play6C in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the K10x is substantially faster. While the Play6C will take well over two hours to fully charge, the K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who need a quick power boost before leaving the house or during a short break.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 480+ and 695 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chipsets can handle everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x will provide a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be less laggy, and the overall user interface will feel more fluid.
