Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone? The Honor Play4 and Play 4T are both contenders, offering decent features at an affordable price. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and performance to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Play4 is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Dimensity 800 chipset, faster charging, and likely a better camera. While the Play 4T offers a more affordable entry point, the Play4's performance advantage makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 03. Released 2020, June 13 | 2020, April 09. Released 2020, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 170 x 78.5 x 8.9 mm (6.69 x 3.09 x 0.35 in) | 159.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Kirin 710A (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired, 70% in 30 min | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Light Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | TNNH-AN00 | AKA-AL10, AKA-TL10 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Honor Play4
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 800)
- 22.5W Fast Charging
- Likely Better Camera Performance
- More Modern Chipset
- Potentially Higher Price
- May have slightly less RAM/storage in some configurations
Honor Play 4T
- More Affordable
- Decent Battery Life
- Sufficient for Basic Tasks
- Slower Processor (Kirin 710A)
- Slow 10W Charging
- Lower Performance
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with a standard resolution (likely FHD+). The Play4 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its newer chipset's image processing capabilities, but the difference will be minimal for everyday use. Expect similar brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are not readily available, the Play4's Dimensity 800 chipset generally offers better image processing capabilities. Expect improved low-light performance and potentially better dynamic range on the Play4. Both likely feature a multi-lens setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth sensor.
Performance
This is where the Play4 shines. The Dimensity 800 is a substantial upgrade over the Kirin 710A. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Play4. The Play 4T will feel sluggish by comparison, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 4000-5000 mAh). However, the Play4's 22.5W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much quicker top-ups compared to the Play 4T's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Honor Play4 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset. The Honor Play 4T is a good option for those on a very tight budget who are willing to compromise on speed and features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor Play4 worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance and faster charging are important to you. The Dimensity 800 chipset provides a significant upgrade over the Kirin 710A.
❓ What are the main differences between the two phones?
The primary difference is the chipset. The Play4 has the Dimensity 800, while the Play 4T has the Kirin 710A. This impacts performance, charging speed, and potentially camera quality.
