The Honor Play10C and Motorola Moto G84 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Play10C focuses on a newer Mediatek chipset, while the Moto G84 prioritizes battery endurance and faster charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and quicker top-ups, the Motorola Moto G84 is the stronger choice. Its measured 996 nits brightness and 30W charging significantly outperform the Honor Play10C's 15W charging, despite the Play10C's newer chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 08 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released Exp. release 2025, August 12 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.61 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 1010 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | NIC-AN00 | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
Honor Play10C
- Newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- 2.5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially lower price (depending on region)
- Slower 15W charging
- Limited battery life data
- Display brightness likely lower than Moto G84
Motorola Moto G84
- Excellent battery life (12:31h active use)
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Brighter 996 nits display
- Older Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially higher price (depending on region)
- Camera performance relies heavily on software processing
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 996 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor use, where the Honor Play10C’s unspecified brightness will likely struggle. While panel technology (LCD vs OLED) isn’t specified for either, the Moto G84’s brightness suggests a well-optimized panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy is an unknown without testing, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Motorola’s marketing often emphasizes image processing, and the Moto G84 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Moto G84 would be a significant advantage, but is unconfirmed. The 2MP macro cameras found on many phones in this price range are generally of limited utility on both devices.
Performance
Both devices utilize 6nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Honor Play10C’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 features a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Motorola Moto G84 employs the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While clock speeds are slightly higher on the Dimensity 6300, the Kryo 660 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 695 are generally more efficient. Real-world performance will likely be similar for everyday tasks, but the Snapdragon 695 may offer a slight edge in sustained workloads due to better thermal management. RAM speed is not specified for either device, but LPDDR4X is a likely assumption for both.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 shines in battery performance. Its active use score of 12:31h and endurance rating of 117h demonstrate superior longevity compared to the Honor Play10C, which lacks comparable data. The 30W wired charging on the Moto G84 is a substantial improvement over the Play10C’s 15W charging. This translates to significantly faster 0-100% charge times, a critical advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery. The Play10C does offer 2.5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature not found on the Moto G84.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play10C if you prioritize a slightly newer processor architecture and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. This phone suits users who primarily engage in light tasks and value the latest chipset generation. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you prioritize battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and faster charging. This is the better option for users who are frequently on the go and need a phone that can keep up with their demanding schedule.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G84 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it's not designed for high-end titles at maximum settings. PUBG will likely run smoothly at medium settings, while Genshin Impact may require lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Dimensity 6300 in the Play10C will offer similar gaming performance.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G84 with the 30W charger?
While Motorola doesn't provide an exact figure, a 30W charger should fully charge the Moto G84 from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes to 1 hour and 30 minutes, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Honor Play10C's 15W charging, which will likely take over 2 hours.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Honor Play10C useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
The 2.5W reverse wired charging on the Honor Play10C is primarily intended for emergency charging of small accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. It's a very slow charging speed and not suitable for quickly charging a phone or larger device.
