The Honor Play10 and Motorola Moto G6 Plus represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Play10, released later, aims for a gaming-focused experience with a more modern chipset, while the G6 Plus prioritizes reliable performance and battery life. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Play10 emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G81 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 630 in the Moto G6 Plus, making it more suitable for gaming and demanding applications. While charging is slower, the performance gains justify the trade-off.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Brazil, India |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 08 | 2018, April. Released 2018, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.7 x 77.7 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.06 x 0.34 in) | 160 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 167 g (5.89 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.9 inches, 89.8 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 508 |
| OS | Android 15 (Go edition) | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.7, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2 - Global
or
16 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.0µm - India |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Cyan, Starry Purple, Midnight Black | Gold, Deep Indigo, Nimbus |
| Models | ELA-LX3 | - |
| Price | - | About 190 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -94.6dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 70h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1459:1 (nominal), 3.865 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 82dB / Noise 76dB / Ring 86dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 90263 (v7)
GeekBench: 4160 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Play10
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- More modern chipset architecture (Helio G81)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 10W charging speed
- Camera specs are unknown, potentially limited
- Display details are lacking
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Proven reliability and consistent performance
- Good battery endurance (70h rating)
- Outdated Snapdragon 630 processor
- Less capable for demanding games and apps
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar display contrast ratio of 1459:1 (nominal) and 3.865 (sunlight), suggesting comparable visibility in bright conditions. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type, resolution, or refresh rate for either device. Given the G6 Plus's age, it likely uses an IPS LCD, while the Play10 *may* have a higher resolution panel, though this is unconfirmed. The lack of detailed display specs makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the G6 Plus's contrast ratio suggests a reasonably well-optimized display for its time.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). Given the market positioning, it’s likely both devices feature modest camera systems. The absence of detailed camera specs makes a direct comparison impossible. However, newer phones generally benefit from improved image processing algorithms, potentially giving the Play10 an edge in image quality, even with similar hardware. We can assume both phones will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Honor Play10’s Mediatek Helio G81, built on a 12nm process, represents a substantial architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G6 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (14nm). The G81’s octa-core configuration, featuring two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.7 GHz, provides significantly better single-core and multi-core performance than the G6 Plus’s all-Cortex-A53 setup clocked at 2.2 GHz. The newer architecture and process node of the G81 translate to improved efficiency and responsiveness, particularly noticeable in gaming and app loading times. The Snapdragon 630, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the Honor Play10 and Motorola Moto G6 Plus boast an endurance rating of 70 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery performance. However, this rating doesn’t account for the differing charging speeds. The Moto G6 Plus supports 15W wired charging, while the Play10 is limited to 10W. This means the G6 Plus will charge from 0-100% faster, a convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Play10 does offer reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the G6 Plus, allowing it to charge other devices, albeit slowly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play10 if you prioritize performance for gaming or multitasking and are willing to accept slower charging. This phone is ideal for younger users or those who frequently use resource-intensive apps. Buy the Motorola Moto G6 Plus if you value proven reliability, consistent battery life, and a slightly faster charging solution, even if it means sacrificing processing power. This is a solid choice for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and basic app usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor Play10 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G81 in the Honor Play10 is specifically designed for gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The Snapdragon 630 in the Moto G6 Plus will likely struggle with these titles, requiring significantly lower settings and potentially experiencing lag.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Motorola Moto G6 Plus compared to the Honor Play10 in real-world use?
The 15W charging on the Moto G6 Plus will noticeably reduce charging times compared to the 10W charging on the Play10. Expect the G6 Plus to gain approximately 5-10% battery every 15 minutes, while the Play10 will likely gain around 3-6% in the same timeframe. This difference is most noticeable when quickly topping up the battery.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Honor Play10 useful for everyday scenarios?
The reverse wired charging on the Play10 is a niche feature, but can be helpful in emergencies. It allows you to slowly charge other devices like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch using your phone's battery. However, due to the 10W output, it's not a fast charging solution for other devices.
