The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Play 8T and OnePlus Ace 2V represent compelling options. The Play 8T aims for affordability, while the Ace 2V brings near-flagship performance down to a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their core differences, focusing on chipset performance, charging speeds, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset provides a substantial performance leap over the Play 8T’s Dimensity 6080, coupled with significantly faster 80W charging. However, the Honor Play 8T remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 17 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 166.7 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.56 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz, 850 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Silver, Black | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | CLK-AN00 | PHP110 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Honor Play 8T
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 6080 chipset
- Slower charging speed (35W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Ace 2V
- Likely a less refined display
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Significantly faster performance with Dimensity 9000
- Ultra-fast 80W charging (32 minutes to full)
- Likely a superior display quality
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load (though 4nm helps)
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Ace 2V's positioning, it likely features a higher quality panel – potentially AMOLED with a higher refresh rate – than the Play 8T, which may utilize an LCD. The Ace 2V's higher price point suggests a more refined display experience with better color accuracy and viewing angles. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Ace 2V may benefit from a slightly smaller chin.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Ace 2V’s higher price suggests a more capable camera system. It’s reasonable to assume the Ace 2V features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Play 8T likely relies on a more basic camera setup, potentially lacking OIS. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, is a significant upgrade over the Honor Play 8T’s Dimensity 6080 (6nm). The Dimensity 9000 boasts a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.05 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 cores at 1.80 GHz. This contrasts with the Play 8T’s configuration of two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process of the Ace 2V’s chip translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads, making it the clear winner for gaming and demanding applications. The Ace 2V likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
While battery capacities are unknown, the charging speeds are a major differentiator. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 32 minutes, is significantly faster than the Honor Play 8T’s 35W charging. This faster charging is a substantial convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. Even if the Play 8T has a slightly larger battery capacity, the Ace 2V’s charging speed will likely result in less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play 8T if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you demand smoother multitasking, a more responsive gaming experience, and significantly faster charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for those benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 6080 in the Honor Play 8T capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 6080 can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Dimensity 9000 in the Ace 2V will provide a much smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compared to the 35W charging on the Honor Play 8T in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Ace 2V can fully charge the phone in approximately 32 minutes. The 35W charging on the Play 8T will likely take over an hour and a half to reach 100%, making the Ace 2V significantly more convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the OnePlus Ace 2V get noticeably warmer than the Honor Play 8T during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9000 is a more powerful chip and will generate more heat under load. However, the 4nm fabrication process helps mitigate this, and OnePlus typically implements effective thermal management solutions. The Play 8T will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
