The Honor Play 60 Plus and Motorola Moto X50 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the mid-range and upper-mid-range smartphone markets. The Honor focuses on delivering a solid experience at an accessible price point, while the Motorola aims for near-flagship performance with a focus on rapid charging and a powerful processor. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and efficient daily use, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset provides a significant performance leap over the Honor Play 60 Plus’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, and the inclusion of 125W wired and 50W wireless charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Honor offers a compelling budget option, the Motorola’s capabilities justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 24 | 2024, May 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 28 | Available. Released 2024, May 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), wooden back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm (6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g or 199 g (6.95 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~92.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.4, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 125W wired
50W wireless
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Black, White | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | ALT-AN00 | XT2401-2 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 510 EUR |
Honor Play 60 Plus
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly lower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely a less advanced camera system
Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 125W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Advanced camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May require more frequent charging if used intensively
Display Comparison
While specific display details (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Honor Play 60 Plus, the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra is expected to feature a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, common in its segment. The core difference lies in the processing power driving these displays. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Motorola will ensure smoother animations and faster response times, particularly noticeable in gaming. The Honor, with its less powerful chipset, may exhibit slight stutters in graphically intensive applications. The absence of LTPO technology in the Honor is also likely, meaning it won't dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Honor Play 60 Plus, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Motorola typically equips its 'Ultra' models with high-resolution sensors and advanced features. The Moto X50 Ultra is expected to feature a capable main sensor, potentially with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), and a focus on computational photography. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will contribute to improved image processing, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Honor Play 60 Plus will likely offer a more basic camera experience, suitable for casual photography but lacking the advanced features and image quality of the Motorola.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.8 GHz and three Cortex-A520 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture is a substantial upgrade over the Honor Play 60 Plus’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Motorola’s CPU offers significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The Motorola also benefits from a more modern GPU, providing a considerable advantage in graphics-intensive tasks. The Honor’s chipset is geared towards efficiency, making it suitable for everyday tasks but limiting its capabilities in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra’s charging capabilities are a standout feature. Its 125W wired charging can replenish the battery from 0-100% in under 20 minutes, a massive time saver. The addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging further enhances its convenience. The Honor Play 60 Plus, with its 35W wired charging, is considerably slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Motorola’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, ensuring minimal downtime. The Motorola’s charging system is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play 60 Plus if you need a reliable smartphone for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and are on a strict budget. It’s ideal for users who prioritize battery life over raw power. Buy the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps, gaming, and content creation, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – both wired and wireless. This is the phone for users who want a taste of flagship performance without the flagship price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor Play 60 Plus struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a budget-focused chipset. While it can handle less demanding games, Genshin Impact and similar titles will likely require significant graphics settings reductions and may still experience frame drops and stuttering. The Motorola Moto X50 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is far better equipped for smooth gameplay at higher settings.
❓ How long does a full charge take on the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra with the 125W charger?
Motorola claims the Moto X50 Ultra can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 30-35 minutes with the 125W charger. This is a substantial improvement over the Honor Play 60 Plus’s 35W charging, which will take considerably longer – likely over an hour.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto X50 Ultra support 144Hz refresh rate for smoother gaming?
While the exact refresh rate isn't confirmed, Motorola typically equips its 'Ultra' models with high refresh rate displays. It's highly probable the Moto X50 Ultra supports at least a 120Hz, and potentially a 144Hz refresh rate, contributing to a smoother and more responsive gaming experience compared to the Honor Play 60 Plus.
