The Honor Play 40 and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver connectivity at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10x emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Honor Play 40’s Snapdragon 480+. Crucially, the K10x’s 67W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing downtime compared to the Play 40’s slow 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 05 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 05 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Mint, Black, Purple | Blue, Black |
| Models | WDY-AN00 | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Honor Play 40
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480+ chipset
- Likely limited gaming performance
Oppo K10x
- Faster Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Improved ISP for better camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- May not include a headphone jack (market dependent)
- LCD display (likely)
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic screen size. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the underlying silicon; the Snapdragon 695 in the K10x has a more capable ISP which *could* translate to slightly better image processing for display output. Without detailed specs like peak brightness or color gamut coverage, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the K10x’s more powerful chipset suggests a potential edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior image signal processor (ISP) in the Oppo K10x provides a significant advantage. A better ISP enables improved noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, even with similar sensors. It’s likely the K10x will produce more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will include a standard macro lens, but these are typically low-resolution and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a clear advantage over the Honor Play 40’s Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, leading to improved sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The K10x’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – is also architecturally superior to the Play 40’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, particularly for demanding applications. Gamers will find the K10x noticeably more capable.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Oppo K10x’s 67W wired charging is the defining factor here. Achieving 80% charge in just 33 minutes is a massive convenience advantage. The Honor Play 40’s 10W charging is comparatively glacial, requiring significantly longer to fully replenish the battery. Even if the Play 40 has a slightly larger battery capacity, the K10x’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential difference in runtime, as topping up is so much quicker.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play 40 if your priority is absolute affordability and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. You’ll need to be patient with charging times. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if quick charging is essential to your daily routine. The K10x offers a more future-proof experience despite a potentially slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with acceptable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship gaming experience, it’s a significant step up from the Snapdragon 480+ in the Honor Play 40, offering a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 10W charging on the Honor Play 40 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes, while the Honor Play 40 will likely take over 3 hours to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the K10x during a short break, whereas the Play 40 requires overnight charging for a full battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 supports carrier aggregation, which allows it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more reliable data speeds. This is a key advantage over older 5G chipsets and will result in a better 5G experience on compatible networks.
