Honor Pad X8 Lite vs Nokia T10: Which Budget Tablet Delivers the Best Value?

The Honor Pad X8 Lite and Nokia T10 represent the entry-level end of the Android tablet market, targeting users who need a larger screen for media consumption, light productivity, and casual gaming without breaking the bank. Both devices aim to deliver a functional experience at an affordable price, but they take different approaches to achieving this, primarily in their chipset choices and overall feature sets.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Honor Pad X8 Lite offers a more compelling experience. Its Mediatek MT8786 chipset, with its faster Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. While the Nokia T10 benefits from a slightly more efficient manufacturing process, the performance difference is more impactful for everyday use.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Pad X8 Lite Nokia T10
Network
2G bandsN/AGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsN/AHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bandsN/A1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
EDGENo-
GPRSNo-
Speed-HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, September 152022, July 12
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, NovemberAvailable. Released 2022, August 20
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions240.2 x 159 x 7.6 mm (9.46 x 6.26 x 0.30 in)208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM
Weight460 g (1.01 lb)375 g (13.23 oz)
 -Splash resistant
Display
Resolution800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~156 ppi density)800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density)
Size9.7 inches, 272.8 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio)8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT8786Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
GPU-Mali-G57 MP1
OSAndroid 12, Magic UI 6.1Android 12, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotUnspecifiedmicroSDXC
Internal32GB32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Features-LED flash
Single5 MP8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p
Selfie camera
Single2 MP2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm
Video720p@30fps720p
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningNoGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging-10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5100 mAhLi-Po 5250 mAh
Misc
ColorsMint BlueOcean Blue
Models-TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457
Price-About 160 EUR
SAR-1.19 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.27 W/kg (head)     1.57 W/kg (body)

Honor Pad X8 Lite

  • More powerful Mediatek MT8786 chipset for smoother performance
  • Faster CPU clock speeds for quicker app loading
  • Potentially better image processing capabilities

  • Likely less battery efficient under heavy load
  • Charging speed not specified, potentially slower than competitors

Nokia T10

  • Potentially better battery life due to the 12nm Unisoc T606
  • Clean Android experience (typical of Nokia)
  • 10W charging included

  • Slower Unisoc T606 chipset limits performance
  • Lower CPU clock speeds result in slower app loading

Display Comparison

Neither Honor nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications beyond screen size. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. While both will be adequate for media consumption, the Honor Pad X8 Lite’s more capable chipset will contribute to smoother animations and faster response times when interacting with the UI. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both devices, but the X8 Lite’s processor may allow for more effective image processing.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for buyers in this segment. Both tablets likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume image quality will be similar – adequate for video calls and quick photos in good lighting conditions, but lacking in detail and dynamic range. Focusing on the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities, the Mediatek MT8786 likely offers slightly better image processing than the Unisoc T606, potentially resulting in marginally better photos.

Performance

The core of the difference between these tablets lies in their chipsets. The Honor Pad X8 Lite’s Mediatek MT8786 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This configuration provides a significant performance boost over the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606, which has two Cortex-A75 cores clocked lower at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also at 1.6 GHz. The higher clock speeds on the X8 Lite’s A75 cores translate to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The Unisoc T606, built on a 12nm process, aims for efficiency, but the performance gap is noticeable. While neither tablet is a gaming powerhouse, the X8 Lite will handle less demanding titles with greater ease.

Battery Life

The Nokia T10 includes 10W wired charging, a relatively slow charging speed in today’s market. While battery capacity isn’t specified in the provided data, the Unisoc T606’s 12nm process *could* translate to slightly better power efficiency. However, the Honor Pad X8 Lite’s more powerful processor may offset this advantage during intensive tasks. Expect both tablets to offer all-day battery life with moderate usage, but the Nokia T10 might edge out the X8 Lite in scenarios involving prolonged video playback or light web browsing. The slower charging speed of the Nokia T10 will require more patience to reach a full charge.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Pad X8 Lite if you prioritize performance for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming. Its more powerful processor will handle demanding apps and provide a smoother user experience. Buy the Nokia T10 if battery life and a clean Android experience are paramount, and your usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like web browsing and video playback. The Nokia T10’s simpler software and potentially lower power consumption may appeal to those seeking a straightforward tablet experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia T10 struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is a relatively low-powered chipset. While it can handle basic multitasking, opening several apps or switching between them frequently will likely result in noticeable lag and slowdowns. The Honor Pad X8 Lite’s Mediatek MT8786 is better equipped to handle heavier multitasking workloads.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Nokia T10 significantly slower than other tablets?
Yes, 10W charging is quite slow by modern standards. Expect it to take several hours to fully charge the Nokia T10 from 0%. While not a dealbreaker for casual users, those who frequently use their tablet throughout the day may find the slow charging speed inconvenient. The Honor Pad X8 Lite’s charging speed is not specified, but it’s likely to be similar or slightly faster.
❓ Can either of these tablets handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Both tablets will struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. While you might be able to run them at the lowest settings with reduced frame rates, expect significant lag and stuttering. These tablets are better suited for less graphically intensive games.
❓ Which tablet is better for streaming video content from services like Netflix or YouTube?
Both tablets are capable of streaming video content, but the Honor Pad X8 Lite’s more powerful processor will provide a smoother playback experience, especially with higher resolution videos. The X8 Lite will also handle background tasks while streaming without as much performance degradation.