The Honor Pad X7 and Nokia T10 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget tablet space. Both aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through significantly different approaches to core hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and overall design choices.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Pad X7 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While both offer similar battery life due to their conservative charging speeds, the X7’s processing power gives it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 24 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 24 | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 211.8 x 124.8 x 8 mm (8.34 x 4.91 x 0.31 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 365 g (12.87 oz) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~179 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.7 inches, 214.9 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 625 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 (6 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 7020 mAh | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Ocean Blue |
| Models | - | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
Honor Pad X7
- More powerful Snapdragon 680 chipset
- More efficient 6nm fabrication process
- Potentially better thermal management
- 10W charging is slow
- Display specs are unknown
Nokia T10
- Clean Android experience (potentially)
- Affordable price point
- Likely lightweight design
- Less powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- 10W charging is slow
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, the choice of panel technology and quality is likely similar given the price points. Both will likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, contributing to a more affordable price. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over color fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Given the budget nature of these tablets, camera performance is unlikely to be a key differentiator. Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but it’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups geared towards casual snapshots. Focusing on megapixel counts would be misleading; image quality will be more heavily influenced by software processing and sensor size, neither of which are specified. Expect adequate performance in well-lit conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Pad X7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process compared to the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680’s octa-core CPU, with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores, offers a significant clock speed advantage over the T10’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both likely utilize similar amounts of RAM, the Snapdragon 680’s superior processing power will make better use of it.
Battery Life
Both the Honor Pad X7 and Nokia T10 feature 10W wired charging, indicating a focus on conservative power management rather than rapid charging. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the similar target market and hardware, they are likely in the 5000-6000 mAh range. The 10W charging will result in relatively slow charging times – expect several hours to reach a full charge. The Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process *could* contribute to slightly better battery life under heavy load, but in typical usage scenarios, the difference will likely be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Pad X7 if you prioritize performance for everyday tasks like browsing, video streaming, and light gaming. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset offers a more fluid experience, especially when juggling multiple apps. Buy the Nokia T10 if you value simplicity and a clean Android experience, and your usage is primarily focused on basic media consumption and light productivity – you’re willing to trade some processing power for a potentially more streamlined software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor Pad X7 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 680 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but it's a significant step up from the Unisoc T606 in terms of gaming performance.
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia T10 sufficient for basic tasks like email and web browsing?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks like email, web browsing, and social media. It won't offer a blazing-fast experience, but it will handle these tasks without significant lag or slowdown.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both tablets with their 10W chargers?
Expect a full charge to take approximately 3-5 hours with the included 10W chargers. Neither tablet supports fast charging, so patience is required.
❓ Which tablet is better for video streaming?
The Honor Pad X7 is the better choice for video streaming due to its more powerful processor. This will result in smoother playback, especially for higher-resolution content. While the Nokia T10 can stream video, it may experience occasional stuttering or buffering.
