Honor's Pad X7 and Pad 8 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget tablet space. While both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, key differences in display quality and charging speed create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which tablet delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Pad 8 is the superior choice. Its significantly faster 22.5W charging and brighter, higher-contrast display justify the price premium over the Pad X7, offering a more enjoyable and convenient daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 24 | 2022, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 24 | Available. Released 2022, July 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 211.8 x 124.8 x 8 mm (8.34 x 4.91 x 0.31 in) | 278.5 x 174.1 x 6.9 mm (10.96 x 6.85 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 365 g (12.87 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~179 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.7 inches, 214.9 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 625 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 350 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 7020 mAh | Li-Po 7250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Dark Blue, Gold, Mint |
| Models | - | HEY-W09 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1468:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-22.7 LUFS (Excellent)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 279242 (v9)
GeekBench: 1545 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.3fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Pad X7
- Most affordable option
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset offers good efficiency
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited multitasking capabilities (RAM unknown)
Honor Pad 8
- Faster 22.5W charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display (392 nits)
- More enjoyable media consumption experience
- Higher price point
- Same Snapdragon 680 chipset as the X7
- RAM configuration unknown
Display Comparison
The Honor Pad 8 boasts a clear advantage in display quality. While both tablets lack information regarding panel type (likely IPS LCD), the Pad 8’s measured 392 nits of maximum brightness significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the X7, making it far more usable outdoors or in brightly lit rooms. The 1468:1 contrast ratio, while nominal for both, suggests a similar viewing experience in terms of black levels. The absence of refresh rate information suggests both are locked at 60Hz, prioritizing battery life over fluidity. The Pad 8’s superior brightness is a key differentiator for media consumers.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for buyers in this segment. Neither Honor provides detailed camera specifications, suggesting basic functionality. The absence of information regarding sensor size or aperture makes it difficult to assess image quality. We can assume both tablets feature a standard rear camera setup, adequate for casual snapshots but not for serious photography. Focusing on the chipset and display is more relevant than scrutinizing camera specs.
Performance
Both the Honor Pad X7 and Pad 8 are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical in day-to-day tasks. The lack of information regarding RAM configurations on both devices makes it difficult to assess multitasking capabilities, but the Snapdragon 680 is generally paired with 4GB or 6GB of RAM in this price bracket. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern given the chipset’s efficiency, but sustained gaming performance will be limited by the processor’s capabilities.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the charging speeds are a significant point of divergence. The Honor Pad X7 is limited to a slow 10W wired charging, translating to a lengthy recharge time. The Pad 8, with its 22.5W wired charging, offers a substantially faster charging experience, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability. This difference in charging speed is a practical benefit that will be appreciated by users who rely on their tablets throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Pad X7 if you prioritize absolute affordability and primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing and light media consumption. Its 10W charging and standard display are acceptable for infrequent use. Buy the Honor Pad 8 if you value a more responsive and visually appealing experience, especially for streaming video or extended reading sessions. The faster charging and brighter screen make it a worthwhile investment for daily use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor Pad X7 and Pad 8 powerful enough for gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it's not designed for demanding titles at high settings. Expect playable frame rates in less graphically intensive games, but you may need to lower settings for more demanding games. Both tablets will likely experience some throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ What kind of storage options are available for the Honor Pad X7 and Pad 8?
Storage configurations aren't explicitly stated in the provided data. However, based on market trends for tablets in this price range, both the Pad X7 and Pad 8 likely offer options ranging from 64GB to 128GB of internal storage. Check retailer listings for specific configurations and whether they support microSD card expansion.
❓ Does the Honor Pad 8 support video playback in high resolutions like 1080p or 4K?
While not explicitly stated, the Snapdragon 680 chipset is capable of decoding 1080p and even 4K video. The brighter display on the Pad 8 will enhance the viewing experience for high-resolution content, making it a better choice for streaming movies and TV shows.
