The Android tablet market is heating up, with Honor and Xiaomi delivering compelling options. The Honor Pad V9 and Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro both aim for the premium mid-range, but take different approaches to performance and charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and real-world implications to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads, and the 67W charging is significantly faster. While the Honor Pad V9 offers a competitive price, the Xiaomi’s superior processing power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | N/A | N/A |
| GPRS | N/A | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 23 | Available. Released 2023, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 259.1 x 176.1 x 6.1 mm (10.20 x 6.93 x 0.24 in) | 254 x 165.2 x 6.5 mm (10.0 x 6.50 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 475 g (1.05 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1840 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~291 ppi density) | 1800 x 2880 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~309 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.5 inches, 391.6 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 500 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, magnetic connector | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired - Global
66W wired - China | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 1 hour |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 10100 mAh | Li-Po 8600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Violet, Gray, White | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | ROL-W00 | 23046RP50C |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Honor Pad V9
- Potentially lower price point offers excellent value.
- Dimensity 8350 is a capable performer for everyday tasks.
- 66W charging (China variant) is competitive.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers superior performance.
- 35W charging (Global variant) is slower than Xiaomi.
- Less refined image processing likely.
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers flagship-level performance.
- 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4 provides rapid charging.
- Likely benefits from Xiaomi’s optimized software.
- Higher price compared to the Honor Pad V9.
- May experience more thermal throttling than expected.
- No specific camera details available.
Display Comparison
Both tablets are expected to feature high-quality LCD panels, though specific details like resolution and refresh rate are not provided. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power driving those displays. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Adreno 730 GPU will deliver a smoother experience in graphically intensive applications. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a factor not specified in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Neither device is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the provided data doesn’t offer specifics beyond the chipsets. Image processing will rely heavily on software algorithms. Given Xiaomi’s history with computational photography, the Pad 6 Pro likely benefits from more refined image processing, even with similar sensor hardware (which is unknown). The absence of details regarding sensor size and aperture makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered more advanced.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, designed for peak performance, alongside three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.75 GHz. This contrasts with the Honor Pad V9’s MediaTek Dimensity 8350, which utilizes a single Cortex-A715 core at 3.35 GHz, three more Cortex-A715 cores at 3.20 GHz, and four Cortex-A510 cores at 2.20 GHz. While the Dimensity 8350 has more cores, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architectural advantages, particularly the X2 core, translate to superior single-core and sustained multi-core performance. The Snapdragon’s more mature process and thermal design also contribute to less throttling under load. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the chipset’s inherent capabilities will be the limiting factor.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the charging speeds are a clear differentiator. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, promises a full charge in approximately one hour. The Honor Pad V9 offers 35W globally and 66W in China. The 66W option narrows the gap, but even then, the Xiaomi’s broader compatibility with charging standards is advantageous. Faster charging is crucial for tablets, as they are often used intermittently throughout the day, making quick top-ups essential.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Pad V9 if you prioritize value and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like media consumption and light productivity. Its Dimensity 8350 is capable, and the potentially lower price point makes it attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, demanding applications, or multitasking. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance boost, and the faster charging minimizes downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8350 in the Honor Pad V9 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8350 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact and similar graphically intensive games will likely require reduced settings on the Honor Pad V9 to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro offers a more comfortable gaming experience at higher settings due to its superior GPU and thermal management.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro support external displays via USB-C, and what resolution/refresh rate can it output?
While not explicitly stated, Xiaomi devices generally support display output via USB-C. Based on similar devices, the Pad 6 Pro is likely capable of outputting up to 4K resolution at 60Hz, but this depends on the capabilities of the connected display and the USB-C cable used. Check Xiaomi’s official documentation for confirmed specifications.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 35W and 67W truly noticeable in real-world use?
Yes, the difference is significant. 35W charging will take considerably longer to reach a full charge, potentially over 2.5 hours. 67W charging, as advertised by Xiaomi, can achieve a full charge in around an hour, making it much more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their tablet.
