Honor Pad 6 vs Nokia T20: A Deep Dive into Budget Tablet Performance

The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Pad 6 and Nokia T20 represent compelling options for users seeking affordable Android slates. While both aim to deliver a functional tablet experience, they take different approaches to chipset selection and feature implementation. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which tablet offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Nokia T20 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc T610, fabricated on a more efficient 12nm process, coupled with a brighter 422 nit display, provides a smoother and more visually pleasing experience than the Honor Pad 6’s older Kirin 710A and lack of detailed display specs. While charging is slightly faster on the Nokia, the overall package is more refined.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Pad 6 Nokia T20
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - US, LATAM
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 40, 66 - US, LATAM
SpeedHSPA, LTE - cellular model onlyHSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps - cellular model only
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
Launch
Announced2020, July 17. Released 2020, July 282021, October 06
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, November 02
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, aluminum backGlass front, aluminum back
Dimensions240.2 x 159 x 7.6 mm (9.46 x 6.26 x 0.30 in)247.6 x 157.5 x 7.8 mm (9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM (cellular model only)Nano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight460 g (1.01 lb)465 g (Wi-Fi), 470 g (LTE) (1.03 lb)
 Stylus supportSplash resistant
Display
Protection-Scratch-resistant glass
Resolution1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~224 ppi density)
Size10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~77.4% screen-to-body ratio)10.4 inches, 307.9 cm2 (~78.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetKirin 710A (14 nm)Unisoc T610 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G51 MP4Mali-G52 MP2
OSAndroid 10, Magic UI 3.1, no Google Play ServicesAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaLED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.2, AF8 MP, AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single2 MP, f/2.45 MP
Video720p@30fpsYes
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS - cellular model onlyGPS - cellular model only
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
Battery
Charging10W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 5100 mAhLi-Po 8200 mAh
Misc
ColorsSpace GrayDeep Ocean
ModelsAGS3-W09, AGS3-AL09TA-1397, TA-1394, TA-1392
Price-About 200 EUR
SAR-1.34 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.35 W/kg (body)

Honor Pad 6

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Honor brand recognition
  • Acceptable for basic tasks

  • Older, less efficient Kirin 710A chipset
  • Likely lower display brightness and contrast
  • Slower 10W charging

Nokia T20

  • Brighter 422 nit display with 1786:1 contrast
  • More efficient Unisoc T610 chipset (12nm)
  • Faster 15W charging
  • Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • Nokia’s software update track record is variable
  • Not a high-performance tablet

Display Comparison

The Nokia T20 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 422 nits and a 1786:1 contrast ratio. While the Honor Pad 6’s display specifications are absent, the Nokia’s numbers suggest a considerably more vibrant and readable experience, particularly outdoors. The lack of detailed specs for the Honor Pad 6 implies a potentially lower brightness and contrast, making it less suitable for prolonged outdoor use or HDR content. The Nokia’s contrast ratio also indicates deeper blacks and more vivid colors.

Camera Comparison

Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the budget nature of both devices, image quality is likely to be similar – adequate for casual snapshots but not competitive with smartphones. Focusing on the processors, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Unisoc T610 may offer slightly improved image processing capabilities due to its newer design, but this is speculative without further data.

Performance

Under the hood, the Nokia T20 utilizes the Unisoc T610, a 12nm chipset featuring a dual-core Cortex-A75 cluster clocked at 1.8 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Honor Pad 6’s Kirin 710A, built on a less efficient 14nm process. The Cortex-A75 cores in the T610 represent a more modern architecture than the Cortex-A73 cores in the Kirin 710A, offering improved single-core performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the T610’s architecture is likely to deliver a snappier experience in everyday tasks and light multitasking. The 12nm process also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.

Battery Life

The Nokia T20 supports 15W wired charging, a modest improvement over the Honor Pad 6’s 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the Nokia T20 translates to quicker top-ups. The Unisoc T610’s 12nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life compared to the Honor Pad 6’s Kirin 710A. This combination of faster charging and improved efficiency makes the Nokia T20 more convenient for users who rely on their tablet throughout the day.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Pad 6 if you prioritize brand familiarity within the Honor ecosystem and are seeking the absolute lowest price point, accepting compromises in display quality and processing efficiency. Buy the Nokia T20 if you value a brighter, more usable display for media consumption and a more modern chipset architecture that offers better sustained performance and power efficiency, even if it means a slightly higher initial investment.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc T610 in the Nokia T20 struggle with demanding games?
The Unisoc T610 is not a gaming powerhouse. While it can handle less intensive titles, demanding games will likely require reduced graphics settings and may experience occasional frame drops. It's best suited for casual gaming and media consumption rather than hardcore gaming sessions.
❓ How does the 12nm process of the Unisoc T610 impact real-world battery life compared to the Honor Pad 6?
The 12nm fabrication process of the Unisoc T610 is more efficient than the 14nm process used in the Honor Pad 6’s Kirin 710A. This means the T610 consumes less power for the same level of performance, resulting in longer battery life during typical usage scenarios like web browsing, video playback, and document editing.
❓ Is the Nokia T20’s display suitable for outdoor use?
With a peak brightness of 422 nits, the Nokia T20’s display is significantly more usable outdoors than a typical budget tablet display. While direct sunlight will still pose a challenge, the higher brightness level improves visibility and reduces glare, making it more comfortable to use in outdoor environments.