Honor Magic8 Pro vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and potentially longer sustained performance, the Honor Magic8 Pro edges out the Oppo Find X7 Ultra thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. However, the Find X7 Ultra delivers excellent battery life and a very competitive charging experience, making it a strong contender for those valuing efficiency and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic8 Pro | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 15 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 23 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 75 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | NanoCrystal Shield (INT); Giant Rhino Glass (China) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2808 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.71 inches, 108.3 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 1800 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 10 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.6, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60/120fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, PDAF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with large amplitude stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5, Auracast, ASHA | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired (Global) 120W wired, 100W PPS, 40W UFCS (China) 80W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh (Global); 6270 mAh (Europe); 7200 mAh (China) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunrise Gold, Sky Cyan, Black, White | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | BKQ-N49, BKQ-AN90, BKQ-AN10 | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 960 EUR | $ 546.64 |
Honor Magic8 Pro
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Oryon cores
- Faster wireless charging (80W)
- Reverse wireless and wired charging options
- Battery life potentially lower due to more powerful chipset
- Specific battery capacity unknown
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Excellent real-world battery life (12:47h)
- Bright display (1165 nits)
- Fast wired charging (100W)
- Less powerful CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Slower wireless charging (50W)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra achieves a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, indicating a vibrant and easily viewable display in direct sunlight. While the Magic8 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, Honor typically employs LTPO panels for adaptive refresh rates, potentially offering power savings. Without specific refresh rate or panel type details for the Magic8 Pro, it’s difficult to definitively declare a display winner, but the Find X7 Ultra’s brightness is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, Oppo’s Ultra branding typically signifies a focus on camera innovation, and the Find X7 Ultra likely features a sophisticated multi-camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to assess image quality. We can assume both phones will offer excellent image processing capabilities, but the Magic8 Pro’s potential for higher processing power could translate to faster image processing times and more advanced computational photography features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic8 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V3 Phoenix L and M cores clocked up to 4.6 GHz. This architecture, designed for peak performance, contrasts with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) which employs a more conventional Cortex-X4, A720, and A520 core arrangement. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 should offer improved power efficiency compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but the Oryon cores are expected to deliver significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Find X7 Ultra’s chipset, while excellent, is a generation behind in core design.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a strong real-world battery performance, achieving 12 hours and 47 minutes of active use. The Honor Magic8 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its more powerful chipset could potentially lead to faster battery drain. The Find X7 Ultra supports 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless charging. The Magic8 Pro offers a more versatile charging solution with 100W (Global) / 120W (China) wired, 80W wireless, and even reverse wireless charging capabilities. The Magic8 Pro’s faster wireless charging and reverse charging options provide added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic8 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest Android performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and are willing to potentially manage slightly higher power consumption. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize all-day battery life, fast and convenient charging, and a refined user experience without sacrificing flagship-level performance.