Honor Magic7 RSR Porsche Design vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and battery longevity, the Honor Magic7 RSR Porsche Design emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and superior battery life provide a noticeable advantage, especially for demanding tasks. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra remains a compelling choice for those valuing a more balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic7 RSR Porsche Design | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 23 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 24 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 77.1 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | NanoCrystal Shield | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LiDAR AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/1.9, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired 80W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5850 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Provence, Agate Grey | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | PTP-AN20 | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 1050 EUR | $ 546.64 |
Honor Magic7 RSR Porsche Design
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Longer battery life in real-world use
- Faster wireless charging (80W)
- Wired charging speed not specified, potentially slower than Oppo
- Porsche Design aesthetic may not appeal to all
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Faster wired charging (100W, 26 minutes to full)
- Potentially more versatile camera system (based on Oppo's reputation)
- More refined software experience (typical of Oppo)
- Shorter battery life compared to Honor
- Less powerful CPU (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs. 8 Elite)
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic7 RSR boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1510 nits compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the Honor’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use. The lack of specific resolution data makes direct pixel density comparisons impossible, but both are expected to be Quad HD+ or higher.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature advanced camera systems. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is known for its dual periscope telephoto lenses, offering exceptional zoom capabilities. The Honor, while likely also featuring multiple lenses, doesn't have publicly available details. The image processing style will likely differ, with Oppo often favoring vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor may lean towards a more natural look. Sensor size and aperture values are crucial, but absent from the provided data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic7 RSR utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) fabricated on a 3nm process, featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (SM8650-AB) built on a 4nm process. The 3nm node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite promises greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, potentially leading to higher sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling. The Oryon cores are also designed for higher single-core performance. While the Gen 3 is a powerful chip, the Elite’s architecture and process node give the Honor a theoretical edge in CPU-bound tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic7 RSR demonstrates a significant advantage in battery life, achieving 15:11 hours of active use compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47 hours. This nearly 2.5-hour difference is substantial. While the Oppo offers faster wired charging (26 minutes to 100% vs. unspecified for the Honor), the Honor compensates with 80W wireless charging, significantly faster than the Oppo’s 50W wireless. Both support reverse wireless charging, but the Honor’s 5W wired reverse charging is slower than the Oppo’s 10W.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic7 RSR Porsche Design if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications, and value exceptional battery life to power through long days. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prefer a more polished, all-around experience with a focus on camera versatility and a slightly more manageable form factor, accepting a trade-off in peak performance and battery endurance.