Honor Magic7 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Honor Magic7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, coupled with its impressive 56:27 endurance, provides a noticeable advantage. However, the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s significantly faster wired charging is a compelling counterpoint.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic7 Pro | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 30 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 08 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 77.1 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g (7.87 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | NanoCrystal Shield, Mohs level 5 | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.6, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, PDAF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with large amplitude stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 33 min 80W wireless, 100% in 44 min Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5850 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5270 mAh (Europe only) | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar shadow Grey, Breeze Blue, Black, White | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | PTP-N49, PTP-AN10 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | € 772.12 / $ 1,099.00 / £ 798.99 | About 650 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 56:27h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (56:27h endurance)
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)
- Fast 100W wired and 80W wireless charging
- High peak display brightness (1521 nits)
- Wired charging is slower than Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Camera specs currently unknown
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (18 minutes)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers strong performance
- Likely excellent color accuracy and display quality
- Strong ecosystem integration for Xiaomi users
- Battery life likely shorter than Honor Magic7 Pro
- Wireless charging slower than Honor Magic7 Pro
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic7 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 1521 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Xiaomi flagships typically prioritize color accuracy and high refresh rates. The key difference here isn’t necessarily peak brightness, but potentially panel technology; the Magic7 Pro likely utilizes LTPO for variable refresh rate, contributing to battery savings. Without Xiaomi 14 Pro display specs, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Magic7 Pro’s measured brightness gives it an initial edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature high-end camera systems. The focus should be on sensor size, optical image stabilization (OIS), and image processing algorithms. Given Xiaomi’s history, the 14 Pro likely emphasizes computational photography and vibrant colors, while Honor may lean towards a more natural image profile. The absence of sensor details prevents a conclusive assessment, but the presence of OIS on both is a safe assumption for flagship-level stabilization.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic7 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – two at 4.32 GHz and six at 3.53 GHz. This architecture is designed for both peak performance and efficiency. The Xiaomi 14 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), employing a more traditional core arrangement (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, etc.). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should translate to better thermal management and power efficiency compared to the 4nm Gen 3, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Oryon cores are also known for their strong single-core performance, which benefits responsiveness in everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic7 Pro’s battery endurance of 56:27 hours is a standout feature, supported by its efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. It also offers impressive charging speeds: 100W wired (33 minutes to full) and 80W wireless (44 minutes). The Xiaomi 14 Pro counters with a blistering 120W wired charging (18 minutes), but its wireless charging is limited to 50W (40 minutes). While the Xiaomi charges faster via wire, the Honor’s significantly longer battery life and reverse wireless/wired charging capabilities provide greater overall versatility. The Magic7 Pro also boasts 1200 battery cycles, suggesting greater long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic7 Pro if you need all-day battery life, prioritize sustained CPU/GPU performance for gaming or demanding tasks, and value the benefits of a more efficient 3nm chipset. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you absolutely require the fastest possible wired charging speeds, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for that convenience. The Xiaomi is also a better choice for users heavily invested in the Xiaomi ecosystem.