Honor Magic7 Pro vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Detailed Performance and Battery Life Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and extended battery life, the Honor Magic7 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and impressive 56:27h endurance outweigh the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s faster wired charging, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic7 Pro | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 30 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 08 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 77.1 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 223 g (7.87 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | NanoCrystal Shield, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 7 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 200 MP, f/2.6, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, PDAF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with large amplitude stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 33 min 80W wireless, 100% in 44 min Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 5850 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5270 mAh (Europe only) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar shadow Grey, Breeze Blue, Black, White | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | PTP-N49, PTP-AN10 | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | € 772.12 / $ 1,099.00 / £ 798.99 | $ 546.64 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 56:27h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Exceptional battery life (56:27h endurance)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower wired charging compared to Oppo
- Camera specs unknown, potential disadvantage
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Incredibly fast 26-minute wired charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Potentially superior camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Shorter battery life compared to Honor
- Lower peak display brightness
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1521 nits compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in the data), the Honor’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use. The lack of information on panel type (OLED, AMOLED) or color accuracy prevents a deeper analysis, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given both phones’ positioning, we can infer high-quality camera systems. Oppo’s Find X series is renowned for its camera prowess, and the ‘Ultra’ designation suggests a focus on advanced imaging capabilities. Honor has also been improving its camera technology. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is impossible. We can assume both will offer excellent image quality, but Oppo likely has a more established image processing pipeline.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic7 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz). This architecture, designed for peak performance, is expected to outperform the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) in CPU-intensive tasks. The Gen 3’s (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) configuration is optimized for efficiency, but the Oryon cores in the 8 Elite offer a raw speed advantage. The 3nm process node of the 8 Elite also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during prolonged heavy use.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic7 Pro demonstrates superior battery endurance with a measured 56:27h compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s active use score translating to approximately 12:47h. While the Oppo boasts faster wired charging (100% in 26 minutes vs 33 minutes for the Honor), the Honor compensates with significantly longer battery life. The Honor also offers faster wireless charging (80W vs 50W) and reverse wired charging (5W vs 10W). The combination of longer runtime and faster wireless charging gives the Honor a clear edge in battery-related features.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic7 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or heavy multitasking, and value exceptional battery longevity. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize a balanced experience with incredibly fast wired charging (reaching 100% in 26 minutes) and a slightly more refined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance and battery endurance.