Honor Magic6 vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Flagships

Both the Honor Magic6 and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone technology, powered by the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. However, they diverge in key areas like charging technology and battery performance, creating a compelling choice for discerning buyers. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing the fastest possible charging and a slightly longer active use battery life, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is the clear winner. Its 100W wired charging significantly outperforms the Honor Magic6’s 66W, and the 12:47h active use score demonstrates superior endurance.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Magic6 Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, January 112024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, January 18Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather)Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions161.8 x 75.4 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.97 x 0.32 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight199 g or 206 g (7.02 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionJurhino glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1264 x 2800 pixels (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.2 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, MagicOS 8Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", AF-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, 10-bit video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
Features-Panorama
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", AF32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 5450 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Green, Blue, Purple, WhiteBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsBVL-AN00PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 570 EUR$ 546.64

Honor Magic6

  • Potentially more affordable price point (speculation)
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
  • Robust feature set (anticipated)

  • Slower 66W wired charging
  • Unknown battery life performance
  • Limited camera information available

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • 100W SuperVOOC charging for rapid top-ups
  • Excellent 12:47h active use battery life
  • High peak brightness display (1165 nits)

  • Likely higher price tag
  • Potential for software bloat (Oppo's history)
  • Camera details still emerging

Display Comparison

While both devices utilize high-end displays, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and readable experience in direct sunlight. The Honor Magic6’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given Oppo’s focus on display technology, the X7 Ultra likely offers a slight advantage in visual clarity and outdoor visibility. We anticipate both will feature high refresh rate panels, but the X7 Ultra’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage.

Camera Comparison

Camera details for the Honor Magic6 are currently unavailable. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to feature a sophisticated camera system, though specific sensor details are lacking. Without knowing the sensor sizes, apertures, and image processing algorithms of the Magic6, it’s impossible to make a definitive camera comparison. However, Oppo’s history suggests a focus on computational photography and high-resolution sensors, potentially giving the X7 Ultra an edge in image quality and versatility. We will need to see detailed camera samples from the Magic6 to assess its capabilities.

Performance

Both the Honor Magic6 and Oppo Find X7 Ultra are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and software optimization. The 4nm process node ensures efficient power consumption, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. RAM specifications are currently unknown for both devices, but LPDDR5x is expected, further enhancing performance.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 12:47h. The Honor Magic6’s battery capacity and active use score are currently unknown. However, the X7 Ultra’s charging capabilities are significantly superior, offering 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes) compared to the Magic6’s 66W. Both support 50W wireless charging, but the X7 Ultra’s faster wired charging provides a more convenient and rapid power-up option. The 10W reverse wireless charging on the X7 Ultra also slightly exceeds the Magic6’s 5W offering.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Magic6 if you value a balanced package with competitive performance and a robust feature set, and aren't overly concerned with having the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you are a power user who demands the quickest top-ups and extended battery life, and are willing to pay a premium for that convenience. The X7 Ultra caters to those who frequently find themselves needing to rapidly replenish their battery throughout the day.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the Oppo Find X7 Ultra's 100W charging compared to the Honor Magic6's 66W in real-world use?
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra can charge from 0-100% in approximately 26 minutes, while the Honor Magic6 will likely take closer to 45-60 minutes with its 66W charging. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery, offering a nearly 50% reduction in charging time.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in either phone exhibit thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While both phones utilize the thermally efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The effectiveness of each phone's cooling system (vapor chamber size, heat dissipation materials) will determine the extent of any throttling. Independent testing will be required to determine which device manages heat more effectively.
❓ What type of wireless charging protocol does each phone support?
Both the Honor Magic6 and Oppo Find X7 Ultra support 50W wireless charging. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra also supports 10W reverse wireless charging, allowing it to wirelessly charge other devices, while the Magic6 supports 5W reverse wireless charging.
❓ Is the difference in active use battery life between the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and the Honor Magic6 significant for average users?
The 12:47h active use score of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a substantial advantage. For users who heavily utilize their phones throughout the day – streaming video, gaming, browsing – this extra battery life can mean the difference between needing to charge mid-day and comfortably lasting a full day on a single charge.