Honor Magic6 Ultimate vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Flagships

Both the Honor Magic6 Ultimate and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android flagship design, powered by the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. However, these devices diverge in key areas like charging technology and battery optimization, creating a compelling choice for discerning users. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and extended battery life, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its 100W wired and 50W wireless charging significantly outperform the Honor Magic6 Ultimate's 80W and 66W respectively, translating to less time tethered to a wall outlet. While both offer identical processing power, the Find X7 Ultra’s battery performance gives it a practical edge.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Magic6 Ultimate Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, March 182024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, March 22Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather)Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight227 g (8.01 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionKing Kong RhinocerosCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, MagicOS 8Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", LiDAR AF, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF-
Video4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
Features-Panorama
Single50 MP, f/2.0, (ultrawide), AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 5600 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, PurpleBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsBVL-AN20PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 900 EUR$ 546.64

Honor Magic6 Ultimate

  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Reverse wired charging (5W)
  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance

  • Slower charging speeds (80W wired, 66W wireless)
  • Unknown battery capacity and active use score

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Faster charging speeds (100W wired, 50W wireless)
  • Longer battery life (12:47h active use)
  • Higher peak display brightness (1165 nits)

  • Likely higher price tag
  • Reverse wireless charging at 10W is less versatile than wired

Display Comparison

While both devices are expected to feature high-quality displays, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits. This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) and color accuracy are currently unavailable for the Honor Magic6 Ultimate, but given the flagship positioning, both are likely to offer vibrant and accurate color reproduction. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, contributing to an immersive viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensors are currently unavailable for both devices. However, the focus should be on sensor size, optical image stabilization (OIS), and lens apertures. Larger sensors generally capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. OIS is critical for sharp images and stable videos. Image processing algorithms will also play a significant role in differentiating the camera experiences. The absence of information on secondary lenses (ultrawide, telephoto) makes a definitive camera comparison impossible at this time.

Performance

Both the Honor Magic6 Ultimate and Oppo Find X7 Ultra are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This ensures comparable raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. However, thermal management will be crucial. The 4nm process node should contribute to improved efficiency, but the effectiveness of each manufacturer’s cooling solution will determine sustained performance under load. RAM specifications are currently unknown for the Honor Magic6 Ultimate, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance with an active use score of 12:47h. While the Honor Magic6 Ultimate’s battery capacity is unknown, the Oppo’s superior charging speeds – 100W wired (0-100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless – significantly reduce downtime. The Honor Magic6 Ultimate offers 80W wired and 66W wireless charging, which are still fast, but noticeably slower. The inclusion of reverse wireless and wired charging on both devices is a convenient feature for topping up accessories, but the Honor’s 5W reverse wired is less powerful than the Oppo’s 10W offering.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Magic6 Ultimate if you prioritize a potentially more competitive price point and value the convenience of reverse wired charging at 5W. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, both wired and wirelessly, and benefit from the longer active use battery score of 12:47h, making it ideal for power users and travelers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Oppo Find X7 Ultra's 100W charging generate significant heat during prolonged use?
While 100W charging is incredibly fast, Oppo incorporates advanced thermal management technologies to mitigate heat buildup. The charging process is dynamically adjusted to balance speed and temperature, preventing damage to the battery and ensuring user safety. Reviews will be crucial to confirm real-world thermal performance.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 perform in the Honor Magic6 Ultimate under sustained gaming loads?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a powerhouse, but sustained performance relies heavily on the Honor Magic6 Ultimate’s cooling system. The 4nm process node improves efficiency, but prolonged gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. Without detailed thermal testing, it’s difficult to predict the extent of potential throttling.
❓ Is the reverse wireless charging on either device useful for more than just earbuds?
While primarily intended for accessories like earbuds and smartwatches, the reverse wireless charging can provide a slow trickle charge to other Qi-compatible devices in emergencies. However, the 5W output of the Honor Magic6 Ultimate and 10W of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra are not sufficient for quickly charging larger devices like another smartphone.