Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Battery, Display, and Performance

Both the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android flagship engineering, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Honor emphasizes endurance and a distinctive design, while the Xiaomi focuses on camera prowess and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design emerges as the winner. Its 14:14 active use score significantly surpasses the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s 11:25, making it ideal for power users. However, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s faster wired charging is a compelling advantage for those who frequently need a quick top-up.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, March 182024, February 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, March 22Available. Released 2024, February 22
Body
BuildGlass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back (NanoCrystal Shield), titanium frameGlass front (Shield Glass), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), titanium frame (grade 5) or aluminum alloy frame
Dimensions162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight237 g (8.36 oz)219.8 / 224.4 / 229.5 g (7.76 oz)
Display
ProtectionNanoCrystal ShieldXiaomi Shield Glass
Resolution1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density)
Size6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1800 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (typ), 3000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
OSAndroid 14, MagicOS 8Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal1TB 24GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional)
Quad-50 MP, f/1.6-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth)
Triple50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", LiDAR AF, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", AF-
Video4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p)
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, DisplayPort, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 33 min 80W wireless, 100% in 46 min 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 5600 mAhMarket-dependent versions:· 5000 mAh (Global)· 5300 mAh (China only)
Misc
ColorsAgate Grey, Frozen BerryBlack, Blue, White, Titanium Gray
ModelsBVL-N59, BVL-AN2024031PN0DC, 24030PN60G
PriceAbout 3020 EUR€ 663.14
SAR-0.83 W/kg (head)     0.82 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.00 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)

Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design

  • Significantly longer battery life (14:14h)
  • Brighter display (1731 nits)
  • Unique Porsche Design aesthetic

  • Slower wired charging (80W)
  • Camera system likely less versatile than Xiaomi

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

  • Faster wired charging (90W, 33min to 100%)
  • Potentially superior camera system
  • Faster wireless charging (80W)

  • Shorter battery life (11:25h)
  • Dimmer display (1281 nits)

Display Comparison

The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1731 nits compared to the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s 1281 nits. This 450-nit difference translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED technology, the peak brightness advantage of the Honor is substantial. Both are expected to have LTPO panels for adaptive refresh rates, but the Honor’s higher brightness provides a clear advantage for outdoor users. The impact of PWM dimming rates, not provided in the data, would be a key differentiator for users sensitive to flicker.

Camera Comparison

The provided data doesn’t offer camera specifics, making a direct comparison impossible. However, Xiaomi’s Ultra series is renowned for its camera capabilities, often featuring large sensors and advanced image processing. The Honor Magic series has been steadily improving its camera performance, but Xiaomi typically holds an edge in this area. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, we can only speculate that the Xiaomi 14 Ultra will likely offer a more comprehensive and versatile camera experience, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information on video recording capabilities further limits this comparison.

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset, featuring the same CPU configuration: 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. Performance differences will likely stem from thermal management and RAM optimization. The lack of RAM specifications prevents a deeper analysis, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x. Sustained performance under heavy load will be the deciding factor, and independent thermal testing is crucial.

Battery Life

The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design delivers a substantial battery life advantage, achieving 14:14 hours of active use compared to the Xiaomi 14 Ultra’s 11:25 hours. This nearly 3-hour difference is significant for users who heavily utilize their smartphones throughout the day. While the Xiaomi 14 Ultra compensates with faster charging – 90W wired (33 minutes to 100%) versus 80W on the Honor – the longer runtime of the Honor is a more impactful benefit for many. The Xiaomi also offers 80W wireless charging (46 minutes to 100%) compared to the Honor’s 66W, and both support reverse wireless charging, though at different wattages (10W vs 5W).

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design if you need exceptional battery life, a noticeably brighter display for outdoor visibility, and appreciate a unique, Porsche-inspired aesthetic. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Ultra if you prioritize the fastest possible wired charging speeds, a potentially more versatile camera system (pending full camera analysis), and are willing to trade some battery endurance for those features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's 80W charging feel slow compared to the Xiaomi 14 Ultra's 90W?
While 90W is faster on paper, the Honor's superior battery life means you'll likely need to charge less frequently. The difference in charging time from 0-100% is approximately 10 minutes, which is often less impactful than the extra hours of usage provided by the Honor's larger battery capacity.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 perform in gaming on both devices, considering the similar CPU configurations?
Given the identical CPU and GPU, gaming performance will largely depend on thermal management. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's cooling system will be critical to prevent throttling during extended gaming sessions. Independent benchmarks and thermal testing are needed to determine which device maintains higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ Is the Porsche Design branding on the Honor just aesthetic, or does it offer any functional benefits?
The Porsche Design branding on the Honor Magic6 RSR is primarily aesthetic, focusing on a unique and premium look. While it may include exclusive software themes or customizations, it doesn't typically translate to significant functional improvements over the standard Honor Magic6 model.
❓ What type of storage does each phone use, and is one faster than the other?
The provided data does not specify storage type (UFS 4.0 is expected on both). Faster storage speeds (UFS 4.0) contribute to quicker app loading times and smoother multitasking. Without this information, we cannot determine if there's a performance difference in storage access.