Honor Magic5 vs vivo X90: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 takes the lead with its blazing-fast 120W charging and potentially superior camera processing. However, the Honor Magic5 boasts a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, offering slightly better sustained performance. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed or raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic5 | vivo X90 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 27 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2022, November 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP64 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1224 x 2688 pixels (~439 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit audio stereo recording | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | 4810 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Green, Purple, Orange | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red |
| Models | PGT-AN00, PGT-N09 | V2241A |
| Price | About 900 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Honor Magic5
- Slightly better sustained performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Potentially better thermal management
- Solid all-around flagship experience
- Slower charging speed (66W)
- Camera processing might not be as refined as vivo's
vivo X90
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially superior camera processing and low-light performance
- Sleek and stylish design
- Dimensity 9200 may throttle under prolonged heavy load
- Software experience may vary depending on region
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays, likely with 120Hz refresh rates. The Magic5 is rumored to have a slightly larger display (6.67 inches) compared to the X90 (6.78 inches). Expect vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling on both. Brightness levels and color accuracy will be key differentiators to look for in reviews.
Camera Comparison
vivo is known for its camera prowess, and the X90 likely leverages advanced image processing. Expect excellent low-light performance and potentially more natural-looking colors. The Magic5 also has a strong camera system, but vivo's software optimization could give it an advantage. Both likely feature multiple lenses including ultrawide and telephoto.
Performance
The Honor Magic5's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally holds a slight edge in sustained performance due to Qualcomm's optimization. The vivo X90's Dimensity 9200 is incredibly powerful, but may throttle slightly under prolonged heavy load. Both offer flagship-level performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The vivo X90's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Honor Magic5's 66W charging is still respectable, but significantly slower. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4800-5000 mAh), so the X90's charging speed is the key differentiator here.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic5 is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power, gaming, and a more balanced overall experience. The vivo X90 is perfect for those who value incredibly fast charging, a potentially better camera experience (especially in low light), and a sleek design.