Honor Magic5 vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: Which Android Flagship Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the Honor Magic5 is the clear winner. However, the Pixel 7 Pro’s superior camera processing and software integration make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic5 | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 27 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2688 pixels (~439 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit audio stereo recording | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Green, Purple, Orange | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | PGT-AN00, PGT-N09 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 900 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic5
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- 66W wired fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Camera performance relies heavily on hardware, lacking Pixel's software optimization
- Display specs are currently unknown, making direct comparison difficult
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Clean and intuitive Android software experience
- Bright and vibrant OLED display with high contrast
- Slower Tensor G2 processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 23W wired charging is relatively slow compared to competitors
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Honor Magic5’s display specs aren’t provided, Honor typically employs high-quality panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED displays, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both devices likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The absence of detailed Magic5 display specs makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s measured brightness gives it a demonstrable edge.
Camera Comparison
Both devices excel in photography, but approach it differently. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms to produce consistently excellent images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the Magic5 are missing, Honor has been increasingly focusing on camera hardware. The Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing prioritizes realistic colors and dynamic range, while Honor often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. Both offer video recording capabilities, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s Super Res Zoom and Cinematic Blur features provide unique creative options. Without detailed Magic5 camera specs, the Pixel 7 Pro’s established software prowess gives it an advantage.
Performance
The Honor Magic5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, promises faster processing speeds for demanding applications. The Tensor G2, while optimized for AI and machine learning tasks, utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores, resulting in lower peak performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a smoother gaming experience and faster rendering times for the Magic5.
Battery Life
Both the Honor Magic5 and Google Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life. However, their charging capabilities differ significantly. The Honor Magic5 supports 66W wired charging, allowing for a much faster full charge compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Magic5 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro provides 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. While the battery life is similar, the Magic5’s faster wired charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic5 if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of 66W fast charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prioritize exceptional camera capabilities, a clean and intuitive software experience, and seamless integration with Google services, even if it means sacrificing some raw speed.