Honor offers a diverse range of smartphones, catering to different budgets and needs. The Magic5 Pro sits at the premium end, boasting flagship specs, while the X9a targets the mid-range market. This comparison dives deep into their features to help you choose the right Honor for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic5 Pro is the clear winner for performance, camera quality, and display brightness. However, the Honor X9a offers excellent value for money with a decent display and acceptable performance for everyday tasks. The Magic5 Pro is for power users; the X9a is for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 27 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 31 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 4.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm
TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.12" 1.4µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/3.0, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", AF
TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm
TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit audio stereo recording | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired
50W wireless
Reverse wireless
5W reverse wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5100 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5450 mAh (China only) | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Meadow Green, Blue, Purple, Orange | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | PGT-AN10, PGT-N19 | RMO-NX1 |
| Price | £ 799.99 / € 407.79 | $ 212.08 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 109h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-24.6 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
GeekBench: 4378 (v5.1), 5096 (v6) | - |
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Flagship Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Exceptional Camera System
- Bright and Vibrant Display (1227 nits)
- Fast Charging (66W wired, 50W wireless)
- Premium Build Quality
- Higher Price Point
- Potentially Bulky Design
Honor X9a
- Affordable Price
- Large Display
- Decent Battery Life
- Stylish Design
- Mid-Range Performance (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Less Capable Camera
- Slower Charging (40W)
Display Comparison
The Magic5 Pro's display is a standout feature, boasting a peak brightness of 1227 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, delivering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The X9a has a 6.67-inch OLED display, offering good color accuracy and contrast, but lacks the Magic5 Pro's sheer brightness and advanced features. The Magic5 Pro also likely has a higher refresh rate (120Hz) for smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The Magic5 Pro's camera system is a major advantage. While specific details are missing, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 typically pairs with advanced camera hardware. The X9a's camera is competent but lacks the advanced features and image processing capabilities of the Magic5 Pro. Expect better low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality from the Magic5 Pro.
Performance
The Magic5 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides significantly faster performance than the X9a's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a superior gaming experience on the Magic5 Pro. The X9a is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Magic5 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life with an active use score of 12:06h and an endurance rating of 109h. The X9a's 40W charging is decent, but the Magic5 Pro's 66W wired and 50W wireless charging offer significantly faster charging speeds. The X9a likely has a larger battery capacity overall, but the Magic5 Pro's efficiency is noteworthy.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic5 Pro is ideal for photography enthusiasts, gamers, and anyone demanding top-tier performance and a premium experience. The Honor X9a is a great choice for students, casual users, and those seeking a stylish phone with a large display without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor Magic5 Pro worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize performance, camera quality, and a premium display, the Magic5 Pro is worth the investment. However, if you're on a budget, the X9a offers a good balance of features and affordability.
❓ What is the difference in camera capabilities between the two phones?
The Magic5 Pro has a significantly more advanced camera system with better image processing, low-light performance, and overall image quality compared to the X9a.
