The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Honor Magic5 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the Honor Magic5 Lite thanks to its superior performance, brighter display, and faster software updates. While the Magic5 Lite boasts impressive battery life, the A54's overall package makes it the more well-rounded choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 15 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 20 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Titanium Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | RMO-NX1, RMO-NX3 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 111h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-31.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1912 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Large display
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Lower performance than A54
- Less vibrant display (likely LCD)
- Potentially slower software updates
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Superior performance
- Brighter and more vibrant display (AMOLED)
- Excellent camera quality
- Samsung's software support and updates
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slower charging speed
- Higher price than Magic5 Lite
- Battery life slightly less than Magic5 Lite
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, significantly brighter than the Magic5 Lite's 864 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite), but the A54's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The A54 also likely has better color accuracy and vibrancy, typical of Samsung's AMOLED panels, while the Magic5 Lite likely uses an LCD.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 generally delivers superior image quality. Samsung's image processing is typically more refined, resulting in more vibrant and detailed photos. The A54 likely has better low-light performance and video stabilization. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be compared for a more precise assessment, but the A54 is generally considered the better camera phone.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Honor Magic5 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The A54's Cortex-A78 cores offer better single-core performance, and the overall architecture is more efficient. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A54.
Battery Life
Battery life is a close contest. The Honor Magic5 Lite boasts an endurance rating of 111h, while the Galaxy A54 has 119h. In active use, the A54 achieves 11:15h. While the Magic5 Lite's rating is slightly higher, the A54's efficiency and slightly larger battery capacity give it a slight edge in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic5 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a large display. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better fit for those who value performance, a vibrant display, and the reliability of Samsung's software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Honor Magic5 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G.
❓ Does the Galaxy A54 have water resistance?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A54 has an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance, while the Honor Magic5 Lite does not.
