The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Magic5 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A34 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 edges out the Honor Magic5 Lite thanks to its brighter display, superior performance with the Dimensity 1080, and faster charging. While the Magic5 Lite boasts impressive battery life, the A34's overall package makes it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 15 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 20 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Titanium Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | RMO-NX1, RMO-NX3 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 111h
|
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-31.4 LUFS (Below average)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1912 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Smooth 5G connectivity
- Decent display quality
- Competitive price
- Slower performance compared to A34
- Less bright display
- Charging speed could be faster
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster performance
- Faster charging
- Reputable brand
- Good camera system
- Battery life slightly less than Magic5 Lite
- 25W charging is not as fast as some competitors
- Price slightly higher than Magic5 Lite
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1009 nits significantly surpasses the Magic5 Lite's 864 nits, resulting in better visibility outdoors. Both offer 'infinite' contrast ratios (a nominal value), but the A34's higher brightness contributes to a more dynamic and immersive viewing experience. Both utilize AMOLED panels, offering excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, Samsung's image processing tends to be more consistent and user-friendly. The A34 likely offers better low-light performance and video stabilization. The Magic5 Lite's camera is still quite good, but may lack some of the advanced features and processing power of the A34.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Honor Magic5 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores offer better single-core performance, while the overall architecture handles multitasking and demanding apps more efficiently. While the Magic5 Lite is perfectly capable for everyday tasks, the A34 delivers a smoother and more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Lite shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 111 hours. However, the Samsung Galaxy A34 isn't far behind with a rating of 133 hours. While the Magic5 Lite has a slight edge in raw endurance, the A34's faster 25W charging means it can replenish its battery more quickly.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic5 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a smooth, albeit not blazing-fast, experience. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more established brand reputation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Honor Magic5 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G.
❓ Is the Honor Magic5 Lite's battery life really that good?
Yes, the Magic5 Lite offers exceptional battery life, easily lasting a day and a half or even two days with moderate usage.
