The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Magic5 Lite and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Magic5 Lite prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Edge 40 Neo focuses on a more modern chipset and faster charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and a lower upfront cost, the Honor Magic5 Lite is the clear winner. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and more powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset make it a better choice for those who demand quicker performance and don't mind more frequent charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 15 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 20 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Titanium Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | RMO-NX1, RMO-NX3 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 111h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-31.4 LUFS (Below average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1912 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (111h endurance)
- Lower price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Slower processor compared to the competition
- Slower charging speed (40W)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster and more efficient Dimensity 7030 chipset
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Shorter battery life (80h endurance)
- Higher price compared to the Honor Magic5 Lite
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays aiming for vibrant visuals, but differ in key areas. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a higher peak brightness of 1073 nits compared to the Honor Magic5 Lite’s 864 nits, making it more legible outdoors under direct sunlight. While both have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Edge 40 Neo’s panel is likely to offer better color accuracy and viewing angles due to its more modern construction. The lack of refresh rate information for the Magic5 Lite suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Edge 40 Neo is expected to have a smoother 144Hz panel, enhancing scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices advertise photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s likely inclusion of more advanced image processing algorithms, coupled with a potentially larger main sensor, suggests superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo, a common feature in this price range, would further enhance image clarity and video stability. The Magic5 Lite’s camera system is likely more focused on providing acceptable results for social media sharing rather than professional-grade photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 represents a significant step up in processing power compared to the Honor Magic5 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 7030 utilizes two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering superior single-core performance for tasks like app launching and web browsing. The Snapdragon 695, with its Kryo 660 Gold cores peaking at 2.2 GHz, is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games or multitasking. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, but the architectural differences favor the Dimensity 7030 in terms of efficiency and overall performance.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Lite shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 111-hour rating. This is significantly higher than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 80-hour rating and 10:28h active use score. However, the Edge 40 Neo compensates with its 68W fast charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Magic5 Lite’s 40W charging is respectable but considerably slower. This trade-off means the Edge 40 Neo can quickly top up its battery when needed, while the Magic5 Lite offers extended usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic5 Lite if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value longevity over raw processing power. It’s ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes the anxiety of daily charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more responsive user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of 68W fast charging, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor Magic5 Lite struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding games like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering, even on lower settings. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compare to standard fast charging?
68W charging is considerably faster than typical fast charging solutions. The Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes, providing a substantial boost in battery life during short breaks. This is a significant advantage over the Honor Magic5 Lite’s 40W charging, which will take considerably longer to achieve the same level of charge.
❓ Is the difference in battery endurance between the two phones noticeable in real-world usage?
Absolutely. The Honor Magic5 Lite’s 111-hour endurance rating translates to potentially two full days of moderate use, while the Edge 40 Neo will likely require daily charging. If you frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets, the Magic5 Lite is the more practical choice.
