Honor Magic4 Pro vs Honor 70: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic4 Pro delivers flagship performance and a brighter display, alongside incredibly fast charging. However, the Honor 70 boasts superior battery life and a more accessible price point. For power users, the Magic4 Pro wins; for everyday users prioritizing longevity, the 70 is a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic4 Pro | Honor 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 09 | Available. Released 2022, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.7 x 9.1 mm or 9.2 mm | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g / 215 g (7.37 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~93.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", AF 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom TOF 3D (depth) | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit audio stereo recording | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 30 min 100W wireless, 50% in 15 min Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Cyan, Gold, Orange | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver |
| Models | LGE-NX9, LGE-N49B, LGE-N19B, LGE-AN10, GBD-NX9 | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 |
| Price | € 469.41 / £ 397.48 | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 82h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 980755 (v9) GeekBench: 3512 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Honor Magic4 Pro
- Flagship Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Brighter Display (957 nits)
- Incredibly Fast Charging (100W wired/wireless)
- Premium Build Quality
- Versatile Camera System
- Higher Price
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life compared to 70
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be power hungry
Honor 70
- Excellent Battery Life (100h endurance)
- Stylish Design
- More Affordable Price
- Good Selfie Camera
- Capable Performance (Snapdragon 778G+)
- Lower Performance than Magic4 Pro
- Less Bright Display (790 nits)
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Less Premium Build
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic4 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 957 nits, significantly brighter than the Honor 70's 790 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Magic4 Pro's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Color accuracy is generally good on both, though the Magic4 Pro might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but the Magic4 Pro generally offers more versatility. While specific camera specs are missing, the Magic4 Pro's flagship chipset often translates to better image processing and low-light performance. The Honor 70 is known for its selfie camera capabilities and stylish portrait modes. Detailed camera comparisons would require more specific information on sensor sizes and lens apertures.
Performance
The Magic4 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Honor 70's Snapdragon 778G+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Magic4 Pro. While the 778G+ is still a capable processor, it's geared towards mid-range performance.
Battery Life
The Honor 70 edges out the Magic4 Pro in battery endurance, boasting an 82h vs 100h endurance rating. However, the Magic4 Pro's 100W wired and wireless charging capabilities allow it to recharge much faster, offsetting the difference in endurance. The 70's 66W charging is still respectable, but not as rapid.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic4 Pro is ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and lightning-fast charging. It's perfect for gamers, content creators, and those who want the latest technology. The Honor 70 is a great choice for users who prioritize battery life, a stylish design, and a more budget-friendly price. It's well-suited for everyday tasks, social media, and photography.