The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Magic4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior performance, brighter display, and faster processor. While the Magic4 Lite boasts impressive battery endurance and fast charging, the A54's more modern features and better camera system make it the more well-rounded choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 104h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Fast 66W Charging
- Competitive Price
- Decent Display
- Lower Performance
- Less Advanced Camera
- Potentially Less Bright Display
- Older Chipset
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter Display
- Superior Performance
- Better Camera System
- Modern Chipset
- Samsung Ecosystem
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Higher Price (potentially)
- Battery life slightly less than Magic4 Lite
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 980 nits peak brightness is significantly higher than the Magic4 Lite's 535 nits, making it much easier to see outdoors. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1229:1 for Magic4 Lite and 'Infinite' for A54), the A54's superior brightness and potentially better color accuracy provide a more immersive viewing experience. The A54 also likely has a more modern display panel technology (likely AMOLED vs. LCD).
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Galaxy A54 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. Samsung typically excels in camera processing and offers more features. Expect better low-light performance, more detailed images, and potentially improved video stabilization on the A54. The Magic4 Lite's camera is likely adequate but won't match the A54's capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 chipset (5nm) offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Magic4 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide better raw processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience. Gaming performance will also be better on the A54.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic4 Lite shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 104h. The Galaxy A54 also has a good endurance rating of 119h and an active use score of 11:15h. While the Magic4 Lite has a slight edge in raw endurance, the A54's slightly better overall battery management and larger battery capacity (likely around 5000mAh) make it a strong contender. The Magic4 Lite's 66W charging is significantly faster than the A54's 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic4 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and fast charging on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, smoother performance, a more versatile camera, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Honor Magic4 Lite has a slightly higher endurance rating, but the Samsung Galaxy A54's battery management and capacity are also excellent, resulting in comparable real-world battery performance.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A54 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance, a better camera, and a brighter display, then the Galaxy A54 is likely worth the extra investment. However, if battery life and fast charging are your top priorities and you're on a tighter budget, the Magic4 Lite remains a compelling option.
