The Honor Magic4 Lite and Oppo Reno7 Lite both target the competitive budget 5G smartphone market, offering a similar Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. However, key differences in battery endurance and charging capabilities, alongside subtle display variations, create distinct user experiences. This comparison dives deep into these nuances to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Oppo Reno7 Lite emerges as the winner. Its 125-hour endurance rating surpasses the Honor Magic4 Lite’s 104 hours, and the inclusion of 33W fast charging with PD provides a more convenient and quicker top-up experience, despite the similar chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 104h
|
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- 66W wired charging (faster peak wattage)
- Decent contrast ratio for an LCD
- Lower battery endurance (104h)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Lacks reverse wired charging
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Superior battery endurance (125h)
- Higher peak display brightness
- 33W charging with Power Delivery (PD) and reverse wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Contrast ratio is nominally 'Infinite' (less quantifiable)
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize LCD panels, but the Oppo Reno7 Lite boasts a significantly higher measured peak brightness of 657 nits compared to the Honor Magic4 Lite’s 535 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility for the Reno7 Lite. While Oppo advertises an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (a common marketing term for LCDs), the Honor Magic4 Lite provides a measured 1229:1 contrast ratio, offering a more quantifiable metric. Neither phone is expected to deliver the vibrant colors or deep blacks of an OLED panel, but the Reno7 Lite’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who spend significant time outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Given the price point, it’s reasonable to expect similar camera performance. Focusing on the main sensor is crucial; the inclusion of 2MP macro or depth sensors is unlikely to significantly impact image quality. Without further specifications, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the image processing algorithms employed by Oppo are generally known for producing vibrant, social media-ready images, which may appeal to some users.
Performance
Both the Honor Magic4 Lite and Oppo Reno7 Lite are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (SM6375) fabricated on a 6nm process. This means CPU performance, with its octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver), will be virtually identical between the two devices. The real-world impact will be similar performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management will likely be comparable, as the chipset itself is not known for generating excessive heat. RAM configurations are not specified, but the performance bottleneck will be the chipset, not RAM, in most scenarios.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 Lite’s 125-hour endurance rating demonstrably surpasses the Honor Magic4 Lite’s 104-hour rating. This suggests the Reno7 Lite is more power-efficient, either through software optimization or component selection. While both phones utilize a similar chipset, the Reno7 Lite’s charging capabilities are a significant advantage. It supports 33W wired charging with Power Delivery (PD), achieving 31% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 63 minutes. The Honor Magic4 Lite, with its 66W charging, *appears* faster, but the Reno7 Lite’s PD support adds versatility. The Reno7 Lite also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Magic4 Lite.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic4 Lite if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a slightly slower charging experience. It’s a solid choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and don’t heavily rely on fast charging. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite if you value extended battery life and faster, more versatile charging. This phone is ideal for users who are frequently on the go and need a device that can reliably last through a full day of moderate to heavy use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 5G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it's not designed for consistently high frame rates in graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Call of Duty. Expect to play these games at medium settings to maintain a stable experience. Both phones will likely exhibit similar performance in gaming scenarios.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 33W and 66W in real-world use?
While 66W appears faster on paper, the Oppo Reno7 Lite’s 33W charging with Power Delivery offers a more efficient and versatile charging experience. The Reno7 Lite reaches 100% in 63 minutes, while the Honor Magic4 Lite’s time isn’t specified, but is likely similar. The Reno7 Lite’s PD support allows it to charge with a wider range of chargers, and the reverse wired charging is a valuable addition.
❓ Is the lack of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) a major drawback for video recording on either phone?
Given the price point of both devices, the absence of OIS is expected. While OIS improves video stability, the Snapdragon 695 5G includes electronic image stabilization (EIS) which can mitigate some shakiness. However, users prioritizing smooth video recording may want to consider phones with dedicated OIS.
