The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Honor Magic4 Lite and the Oppo Find X5 Lite. Both promise a blend of style, performance, and features, but which one truly comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X5 Lite edges out the Honor Magic4 Lite thanks to its slightly faster processor, superior charging capabilities (including PD), and a marginally better battery life. However, the Magic4 Lite remains a strong contender, especially if you prioritize a very long standby time.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Starlight Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 104h
|
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Vibrant display
- Competitive price
- Good standby time
- Slightly slower performance
- Charging speed could be faster
- Camera performance not class-leading
Oppo Find X5 Lite
- Faster processor
- Quick charging (65W with PD)
- Sleek design
- Potentially better camera
- Slightly shorter battery life than Magic4 Lite
- Price may be higher
- Nominal contrast ratio is difficult to quantify
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Oppo Find X5 Lite boasts a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting potentially deeper blacks and richer colors. The Honor Magic4 Lite's measured 1229:1 contrast ratio is still excellent, and its 535 nits brightness is competitive. While both offer good viewing experiences, the Oppo's display *potentially* has a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but the Oppo Find X5 Lite often receives praise for its image processing and color accuracy. The Honor Magic4 Lite's camera is capable, but may not deliver the same level of detail or dynamic range in certain conditions. Further testing would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
Performance
The Oppo Find X5 Lite's MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset generally outperforms the Honor Magic4 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 900's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. While both are capable for everyday tasks, the Oppo offers a smoother experience for more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with endurance ratings of 104h and 123h respectively. The Oppo Find X5 Lite holds a slight advantage here, providing a bit more longevity on a single charge. The Oppo's 65W charging is also significantly faster than the Honor's 66W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic4 Lite is ideal for users who prioritize exceptional battery life and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Oppo Find X5 Lite is a better choice for those who value faster performance, quicker charging, and a more modern design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Find X5 Lite has a slightly better endurance rating (123h) compared to the Honor Magic4 Lite (104h), but both offer excellent battery performance.
❓ Is the Oppo Find X5 Lite worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and faster charging, the Oppo Find X5 Lite is likely worth the investment. However, if battery life is your top priority and you're on a tighter budget, the Honor Magic4 Lite remains a compelling option.
