Honor continues to deliver compelling mid-range smartphones. The Magic4 Lite and Honor 70 both offer attractive features, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best suits your priorities and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor 70 emerges as the clear winner, offering a significantly faster processor, brighter display, and slightly better camera capabilities. While the Magic4 Lite boasts impressive battery life, the 70's overall performance and features justify its slightly higher price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF
50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver |
| Models | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 104h
|
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Large display
- Affordable price
- 66W fast charging
- Less powerful processor
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially lower camera quality
- No high refresh rate display
Honor 70
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 778G+)
- Brighter display
- Better camera performance
- Faster charging (60% in 20 mins)
- Likely 120Hz refresh rate
- Slightly shorter battery life (though still good)
- Higher price point
- Reverse wired charging may be a niche feature
Display Comparison
The Honor 70's display shines with a measured 790 nits of peak brightness, significantly outperforming the Magic4 Lite's 535 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1229:1 for Magic4 Lite and 'Infinite' nominal for 70), the 70's brightness makes it much more usable outdoors. The 70 also likely has a higher refresh rate (typically 120Hz) which the Magic4 Lite lacks, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Honor 70 generally produces better results. The 70 likely features a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. While specific camera specs are missing, the 778G+ chip also contributes to better image processing. Expect better low-light performance and more detailed photos from the 70.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G+ 5G in the Honor 70 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Magic4 Lite. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 778G+ handles demanding games with ease, while the Magic4 Lite might struggle with more graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic4 Lite holds a slight edge in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 104h rating compared to the 70's 100h. However, the 70's 66W charging is faster, reaching 60% in just 20 minutes, while the Magic4 Lite also has 66W charging. The difference in real-world usage is likely minimal.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic4 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing long battery life and a large display for media consumption. The Honor 70 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother user experience, faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor 70 worth the extra money compared to the Magic4 Lite?
Yes, if performance and camera quality are important to you. The 70 offers a significant upgrade in these areas, justifying the higher price.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Honor 70 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful processor and potentially higher refresh rate display.