Honor Magic3 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 888 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its 81-hour endurance rating, coupled with both 65W wired and 30W wireless charging, provides a more versatile and convenient power experience. While the Honor Magic3 offers competitive 66W wired charging, the Find X3 Pro’s overall battery management and wireless charging capability give it an edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 20 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or vegan leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 8.99 mm (Glass) / 9.5 mm (Vegan Leather) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 203 g (Glass) / 202 g (Vegan Leather) (7.16 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP54, dust and water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Golden Hour (Vegan Leather), Blue Hour (Vegan Leather), Black, White | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | ELZ-AN00 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 670 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3
- Very fast 66W wired charging
- Powered by the Snapdragon 888
- Potentially competitive price (depending on market)
- Limited battery endurance information
- No wireless charging specified
- Limited reverse charging capability
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Excellent 81-hour battery endurance
- 65W wired and 30W wireless charging
- High peak display brightness (774 nits)
- Snapdragon 888 can be prone to throttling
- Camera specs lack detail
- May be more expensive than the Honor Magic3
Display Comparison
Both the Honor Magic3 and Oppo Find X3 Pro utilize high-quality displays, but key differences exist. The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, suggesting a more visible screen in direct sunlight. While the Magic3’s display specs aren’t provided, Oppo’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), indicating excellent black levels. The absence of LTPO information for either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rate technology for optimal power efficiency, a feature becoming increasingly common in flagship phones.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone relies on a particularly groundbreaking camera system, focusing instead on software processing and overall image quality. The lack of mention of a telephoto lens on either device suggests they may rely more on digital zoom than optical zoom.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, thermal management – not explicitly detailed for either phone – will be crucial. The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate heat under sustained load, and the effectiveness of each manufacturer’s cooling solution will determine whether throttling occurs during demanding tasks like gaming. RAM specifications are not provided, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro holds a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 81-hour rating. While the Honor Magic3’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Find X3 Pro’s endurance suggests superior power efficiency. Charging speeds are competitive: the Honor Magic3 offers 66W wired charging, while the Oppo Find X3 Pro provides 65W wired charging with a 40% charge in 10 minutes. Crucially, the Find X3 Pro adds 30W wireless charging (100% in 80 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The Magic3 only offers 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic3 if you prioritize the absolute fastest *wired* charging speeds and are comfortable with a potentially less refined overall battery experience. It’s a good option for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day and don’t rely heavily on wireless charging. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value long-lasting battery life, the convenience of wireless charging, and a more balanced approach to power management. This phone is ideal for users who want a flagship that can comfortably last a full day on a single charge and offers flexible charging options.