Honor Magic3 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a slightly more refined software experience, the Honor Magic3 Pro+ edges out the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra. Its faster 66W wireless charging and marginally higher CPU clock speed provide a tangible advantage, despite the Mi 11 Ultra’s excellent endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 19 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 9.9 mm (6.41 x 2.95 x 0.39 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 236 g (8.32 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 64 MP, f/2.4, 11mm 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 66W wireless 5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | ELZ-AN20 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3 Pro+
- Faster 66W wireless charging
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed (Snapdragon 888+)
- Potentially better thermal management
- Battery capacity not specified
- Display specs largely unknown
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Excellent 95-hour endurance rating
- High peak display brightness (943 nits)
- Established camera system with video focus
- Slower wireless charging (10W)
- Snapdragon 888 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 943 nits, a strong figure ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. However, the Honor Magic3 Pro+’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, but without knowing the Magic3 Pro+'s refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO would be a significant advantage for power efficiency), the Mi 11 Ultra holds a slight edge based on available data. The Mi 11 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is typical for OLED displays, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices excel in photography and videography, but their approaches differ. The context data doesn’t provide specific camera specs beyond ‘Photo / Video’ for both. Given Xiaomi’s history, the Mi 11 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor and a more versatile zoom system. However, Honor has been aggressively improving its camera capabilities, and the Magic3 Pro+ likely benefits from advanced computational photography algorithms. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s reputation for video quality and its secondary display for selfie previews give it a potential advantage for content creators.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 series, but the Honor Magic3 Pro+ features the Snapdragon 888+ 5G, clocked slightly higher at 2.99 GHz versus the Mi 11 Ultra’s 2.84 GHz. While the difference may seem small, the Cortex-X1 prime core’s speed boost can translate to snappier responsiveness in demanding tasks. Both utilize the same Adreno 660 GPU and LPDDR5 RAM, suggesting similar graphics performance. However, the 888+’s improved thermal design *should* result in less throttling during sustained workloads, benefiting gamers and video editors. The Mi 11 Ultra’s cooling system, while robust, may struggle to maintain peak performance as consistently.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Honor Magic3 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired and wireless charging capabilities are significantly faster than the Mi 11 Ultra’s 67W wired and 10W wireless. The Mi 11 Ultra can reach 100% charge in 36 minutes (wired) and 39 minutes (wireless), while the Magic3 Pro+’s wireless charging is substantially quicker. This faster charging speed mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage the Magic3 Pro+ might have, making it more convenient for users who prefer frequent, short charging sessions.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic3 Pro+ if you need the absolute fastest wireless charging available and value a slightly more streamlined software experience. It’s ideal for power users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you prioritize a proven track record of battery endurance and a more established camera system, particularly if you frequently shoot video and appreciate its unique secondary display.