Honor Magic3 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing ultimate charging speed and a slight performance edge, the Honor Magic3 Pro+ is the winner. Its 66W wired *and* wireless charging, coupled with the Snapdragon 888+, offer a faster, more convenient experience. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro remains a strong contender with excellent battery endurance and a refined camera system.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 19 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 9.9 mm (6.41 x 2.95 x 0.39 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 236 g (8.32 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 64 MP, f/2.4, 11mm 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF TOF 3D (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 66W wireless 5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | ELZ-AN20 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3 Pro+
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ processor
- 66W wired and wireless charging
- Reverse wireless and wired charging
- Potentially higher sustained performance
- Battery capacity not specified
- Software ecosystem less established than Oppo
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Excellent 81-hour battery endurance
- Unique wide-angle lens with freeform surface
- Refined and consistent software experience
- Fast 65W wired charging
- Slower wireless charging (30W)
- Slightly slower processor than Honor
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright sunlight. While the Honor Magic3 Pro+’s peak brightness isn’t explicitly stated, it’s reasonable to assume it’s comparable given its flagship status. Both devices likely utilize LTPO displays for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The Find X3 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is typical marketing hyperbole; both phones will deliver excellent contrast. The key difference likely lies in color calibration and accuracy, which would require dedicated testing.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are described as having Photo/Video capabilities. The Oppo Find X3 Pro is known for its unique wide-angle lens with a freeform surface, minimizing distortion. Without specific sensor size and aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Image processing styles will also differ – Oppo typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor’s processing may be more natural. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes a direct comparison challenging.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm), but the Honor Magic3 Pro+ steps up to the Snapdragon 888+ 5G. This ‘plus’ variant features a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed – 2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 in the Honor versus 2.84 GHz in the Oppo. While the difference may seem small, it can translate to a measurable performance boost in sustained workloads. Both devices feature an octa-core CPU configuration with the same Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Honor’s faster CPU benefits users engaged in demanding tasks like video editing or heavy gaming. Both likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed (e.g., LPDDR5X) isn’t specified, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro has an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Honor Magic3 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but its 66W wired and 66W wireless charging capabilities are a significant advantage. The Oppo Find X3 Pro supports 65W wired charging (40% in 10 minutes) and 30W wireless charging (100% in 80 minutes). The Honor’s faster wireless charging is a key differentiator, offering convenience for users who prefer cable-free power-ups. The 5W reverse wireless and wired charging on the Honor adds a niche utility for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic3 Pro+ if you need the fastest possible charging – both wired and wireless – and demand the highest possible CPU clock speed for demanding tasks. This phone is ideal for power users who frequently drain their battery and want minimal downtime. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a well-balanced camera system, and a slightly more established software ecosystem. It’s the better choice for users who value longevity and a polished, consistent experience.