Honor Magic3 Pro vs Huawei P50 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Huawei P50 Pro edges out the Magic3 Pro thanks to its exceptional camera system and impressive battery life. While the Magic3 Pro offers a slightly faster chipset, the P50 Pro's overall balance of features and performance makes it the stronger contender for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 Pro | Huawei P50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 01 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or vegan leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 9.0 mm or 9.5 mm | 158.8 x 72.8 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g / 213 g (7.48 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1228 x 2700 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Kirin 9000 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP24Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 14.2 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 7x lossless zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF 40 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (B/W), AF |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 66W wireless 5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless charging |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4360 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Golden Hour (Vegan Leather), Black, White | Golden Black, Cocoa Gold, Pearl White, Charm Pink |
| Models | ELZ-AN10 | JAD-AL50, JAD-LX9, JAD-AL00 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | $ 196.62 / £ 329.00 / € 473.13 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 793876 (v8), 786215 (v9) GeekBench: 3145 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3 Pro
- Slightly faster chipset (Snapdragon 888+)
- 66W wired and wireless charging
- 5W reverse wireless charging
- Good overall performance
- Battery life not as impressive as P50 Pro
- Camera not quite as refined as P50 Pro
- Software support potentially less extensive than Snapdragon devices
Huawei P50 Pro
- Exceptional camera system
- Outstanding battery life (76h endurance)
- 50W wireless charging
- Premium design and build quality
- Kirin 9000 chipset may have limited software support
- 4G connectivity only (in some regions)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays. The P50 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 754 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, suggesting superior image quality. The Magic3 Pro's display is also vibrant and sharp, but lacks specific brightness measurements. Color accuracy is likely excellent on both, but the P50 Pro's higher brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P50 Pro's camera system is its standout feature. It's renowned for its exceptional image quality, particularly in photography, with advanced computational photography capabilities. The Magic3 Pro's camera is also very capable, but doesn't quite reach the same level of detail and dynamic range as the P50 Pro. Video recording is strong on both, but the P50 Pro's image processing often produces more pleasing results.
Performance
The Honor Magic3 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 888+ chipset, generally offering a slight performance advantage over the Kirin 9000 in the Huawei P50 Pro. However, real-world performance differences are likely minimal for most users. Both phones handle demanding games and multitasking with ease. The Snapdragon 888+ also benefits from wider software support and potentially better optimization.
Battery Life
The Huawei P50 Pro demonstrates exceptional battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 76 hours. The Honor Magic3 Pro's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the P50 Pro's longevity. Both offer 66W wired charging, enabling relatively quick top-ups. The P50 Pro also includes 50W wireless charging, a notable advantage.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic3 Pro is ideal for power users who prioritize raw performance and fast charging. The Huawei P50 Pro is a better choice for photography enthusiasts and those seeking long-lasting battery life and a refined user experience.