Honor Magic3 Pro vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Huawei Mate 50 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, despite the 4G limitation, delivers excellent performance and superior battery life (10:36h active use, 104h endurance rating) compared to the Magic3 Pro. The Mate 50 Pro’s 946 nits peak brightness also provides a better viewing experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 Pro | Huawei Mate 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or vegan leather back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 9.0 mm or 9.5 mm | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g / 213 g (7.48 oz) | 205 g / 209 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Huawei Kunlun Glass |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1212 x 2616 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~428 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 111.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | EMUI 13 (International), HarmonyOS 3.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message (sending only) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 66W wireless 5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Golden Hour (Vegan Leather), Black, White | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange |
| Models | ELZ-AN10 | DCO-AL00, DCO-LX9 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 900 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 979921 (v9) GeekBench: 3839 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3 Pro
- Faster CPU clock speed (2.99 GHz vs 3.19 GHz)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- 66W wireless charging is faster than Mate 50 Pro's 50W
- Less efficient Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Display brightness is unknown and likely lower
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- More efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Superior battery life (10:36h active use)
- Brighter display (946 nits)
- Likely better camera image processing
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower wireless charging (50W vs 66W)
- Potentially less raw CPU power in specific benchmarks
Display Comparison
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 946 nits measured, compared to the Honor Magic3 Pro’s unspecified peak brightness. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Mate 50 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology. The lack of detailed refresh rate information for the Magic3 Pro leaves the Mate 50 Pro as the clear winner in display quality based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Given Huawei’s historical strength in mobile photography, the Mate 50 Pro likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. Without specific details on megapixel counts, aperture values, or OIS implementation, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Huawei’s brand reputation suggests an edge for the Mate 50 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 50 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Honor Magic3 Pro’s Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s newer Cortex-X2 core (3.19 GHz) and Cortex-A710 cores (2.75 GHz) offer improved single-core and multi-core performance, respectively, compared to the Magic3 Pro’s Cortex-X1 (2.99 GHz) and A78 cores (2.42 GHz). Crucially, the 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. However, the Mate 50 Pro is limited to 4G connectivity, a significant drawback for users in 5G areas.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro demonstrably excels in battery life, achieving an impressive 10:36h of active use and a 104-hour endurance rating. While the Honor Magic3 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 66W wired and 66W wireless charging capabilities are matched by the Mate 50 Pro’s 66W wired and 50W wireless charging. The Mate 50 Pro’s superior efficiency, stemming from the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s 4nm process, allows it to extract significantly more usage from its battery, making it the clear winner for users prioritizing longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic3 Pro if you absolutely require 5G connectivity and prioritize the fastest possible CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks, even at the cost of battery life. Buy the Huawei Mate 50 Pro if you value exceptional battery endurance, a brighter display, and a refined camera experience, and can live without 5G connectivity. The Mate 50 Pro is the better all-rounder for the average user.