Honor Magic3 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: Which Snapdragon Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic3 Pro+ emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset offers a marginal performance advantage, coupled with incredibly fast 66W wireless charging. While the Mi 11 Ultra boasts excellent battery endurance and a bright display, the Magic3 Pro+'s overall package delivers a more refined flagship experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic3 Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 19 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 74.9 x 9.9 mm (6.41 x 2.95 x 0.39 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 236 g (8.32 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom 64 MP, f/1.8, (monochrome) 64 MP, f/2.4, 11mm 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF TOF 3D (depth) | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 66W wireless 5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | ELZ-AN20 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 1070 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic3 Pro+
- Faster Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Faster 66W wireless charging
- Potential for better thermal management
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Battery capacity not specified (potentially smaller)
- Camera processing style may not appeal to all
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Excellent 95-hour battery endurance
- Very bright display (943 nits)
- Versatile camera system
- Robust build quality
- Slightly slower processor (Snapdragon 888)
- Slower wireless charging compared to Honor
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 943 nits, ensuring excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Honor Magic3 Pro+’s peak brightness isn’t explicitly stated, it’s reasonable to assume it’s comparable given its flagship status. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Mi 11 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is typical of AMOLED technology. However, the Magic3 Pro+ may benefit from a higher PWM dimming rate, potentially reducing eye strain for users sensitive to flicker, a detail not specified but common in Honor’s displays.
Camera Comparison
Both devices excel in camera performance, but approach it differently. The context data doesn’t provide enough detail to make a definitive judgment. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the Mi 11 Ultra likely emphasizes computational photography and versatile zoom capabilities. Honor, historically, focuses on color accuracy and natural image processing. The absence of sensor size details makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s camera module is physically larger, suggesting potentially larger sensors. Both are capable of excellent photo and video quality, but the user experience and processing style will likely be the key differentiators.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 series, but the Honor Magic3 Pro+ features the Snapdragon 888+ 5G, clocked slightly higher at 2.99 GHz versus the Mi 11 Ultra’s 2.84 GHz. This represents a modest performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with the same Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. While both likely feature LPDDR5 RAM, the Magic3 Pro+'s chipset advantage suggests better thermal management and potentially less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Mi 11 Ultra’s performance is still excellent, but the ‘+’ version of the Snapdragon gives Honor a slight edge.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Magic3 Pro+'s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Mi 11 Ultra’s rating suggests a larger battery. However, the Honor Magic3 Pro+ compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired and 66W wireless, compared to the Mi 11 Ultra’s 67W wired and 67W wireless. The Magic3 Pro+ also offers 5W reverse wireless charging, a feature the Mi 11 Ultra lacks. The Mi 11 Ultra achieves 100% charge in 36 minutes (wired) and 39 minutes (wireless), while the Magic3 Pro+ is likely comparable, potentially slightly faster with its 66W wireless capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic3 Pro+ if you prioritize peak performance, exceptionally fast wireless charging, and a slightly more modern software experience. This phone is ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and those who frequently rely on wireless charging. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you value exceptional battery life, a very bright display for outdoor visibility, and a robust camera system with a focus on versatility. It’s a better fit for users who prioritize longevity and all-around camera capabilities over raw processing power.