Honor Magic Vs vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: A Deep Dive into Foldable Supremacy
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers noticeably faster performance and improved efficiency, while the brighter display enhances outdoor visibility. However, the Honor Magic Vs remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, August 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1 mmFolded: 154.9 x 67.1 x 13.4 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 261 g / 267 g (9.21 oz) | 253 g (8.92 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1812 x 2176 pixels (~373 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.2 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 - InternationalAndroid 12, MagicOS 7 - China | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 66mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide) | 4 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cyan, Black, Orange | Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, Blue |
| Models | FRI-AN00, FRI-NX9 | SM-F946B, SM-F946B/DS, SM-F946U, SM-F946U1, SM-F946N, SM-F946W, SM-F9460 |
| Price | About 2940 EUR | € 660.00 / $ 607.00 / £ 520.69 / ₹ 86,000 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 85h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -23.4 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 831175 (v9) GeekBench: 3971 (v5.1), 4497 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Honor Magic Vs
- More affordable price point
- Excellent battery endurance (85h rating)
- Faster wired charging (66W)
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Less bright display (876 nits)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset for superior performance
- Significantly brighter display (1257 nits)
- Faster wireless charging (15W)
- Higher price tag
- Slightly lower battery endurance (95h rating)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5’s display significantly outshines the Honor Magic Vs in peak brightness, reaching 1257 nits compared to the Magic Vs’ 876 nits. This translates to a much more usable experience in direct sunlight. Both utilize foldable OLED panels, but the Z Fold5 benefits from Samsung’s Display Dynamic AMOLED 2X technology, likely offering superior color accuracy and viewing angles. While both have an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the Z Fold5 provides a more vibrant and impactful image. The Z Fold5’s improved hinge also contributes to a less noticeable crease, enhancing the overall viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking in the provided data. However, given Samsung’s history, the Z Fold5 likely boasts a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors. The Z Fold5’s camera benefits from Samsung’s computational photography expertise, offering features like improved night mode and enhanced dynamic range. While both can capture photo and video, the Z Fold5 is expected to deliver more consistent and higher-quality results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of specific details prevents a definitive assessment, but Samsung typically prioritizes camera performance in its flagship devices.
Performance
The core difference here lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy Z Fold5’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Magic Vs’ Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture (Cortex-X3 vs X2) and a faster GPU, resulting in a noticeable performance boost in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Z Fold5’s CPU configuration (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is more efficient than the Magic Vs’ (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). This efficiency, combined with the 4nm process, means less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the Z Fold5’s optimized chipset will extract more performance from it.
Battery Life
The Galaxy Z Fold5’s endurance rating of 95 hours edges out the Honor Magic Vs’ 85 hours, despite a similar battery capacity (not specified in the data). This difference is attributable to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior power efficiency. The Z Fold5 also offers faster charging at 25W wired (50% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless, compared to the Magic Vs’ 66W wired and 5W reverse wired. While 66W sounds faster, the Z Fold5’s efficiency means it can achieve a comparable charge level in a similar timeframe. The Magic Vs’ 5W reverse wired charging is significantly slower than the Z Fold5’s 4.5W reverse wireless, making it less practical for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic Vs if you prioritize all-day battery life and a more affordable entry point into the foldable world. It’s ideal for users who consume a lot of media and don’t necessarily need the absolute latest processing power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 if you demand the fastest performance, a brighter and more refined display, and the latest software features, even at a premium price. This is the phone for power users and those who want the best foldable experience available.