Honor Magic Vs vs. Oppo Find N3 Flip: A Deep Dive into Foldable Supremacy

The foldable market is heating up, with clamshell 'flip' designs like the Oppo Find N3 Flip challenging the larger 'fold' form factor exemplified by the Honor Magic Vs. This comparison dissects these two distinct approaches, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses to determine which foldable best suits your needs and budget.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing sustained performance and a larger, more immersive display, the Honor Magic Vs emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and 85-hour endurance rating provide a robust experience. However, the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s superior battery endurance and faster charging make it a compelling choice for those valuing portability and convenience.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor Magic Vs Oppo Find N3 Flip
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x -
Launch
Announced2022, November 232023, August 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, December 30Available. Released 2023, September 08
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back or eco leather back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanismPlastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame
DimensionsUnfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mmUnfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight261 g / 267 g (9.21 oz)198 g (6.98 oz)
Display
Resolution1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density)1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nitsFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak)
 Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 730Immortalis-G715 MC11
OSAndroid 13, MagicOS 7.1 - InternationalAndroid 12, MagicOS 7 - ChinaAndroid 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired 5W reverse wired44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 4300 mAh
Misc
ColorsCyan, Black, OrangeCream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black
ModelsFRI-AN00, FRI-NX9PHT110, CPH2519
PriceAbout 2940 EURAbout 1200 EUR
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 85h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -23.4 LUFS (Very good) -
Performance AnTuTu: 831175 (v9) GeekBench: 3971 (v5.1), 4497 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

Honor Magic Vs

  • Larger, more immersive foldable display
  • Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
  • Excellent thermal management for sustained performance

  • Slightly lower battery endurance compared to the N3 Flip
  • Larger form factor may be less pocketable

Oppo Find N3 Flip

  • Superior battery life and endurance rating
  • Faster charging speed (50% in 23 minutes)
  • More compact and pocketable flip design

  • Smaller internal display
  • Dimensity 9200 may throttle under sustained load

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a slightly brighter display at 939 nits measured, compared to the Honor Magic Vs’s 876 nits. While both offer excellent visibility, the N3 Flip’s advantage is noticeable in direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, delivering deep blacks. However, the Magic Vs’s larger foldable display provides a significantly more expansive viewing area, crucial for productivity and media consumption. The N3 Flip’s external cover screen adds a layer of convenience for quick glances at notifications and widgets, a feature absent on the Magic Vs.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The focus should be on image processing and overall quality. The Oppo Find N3 Flip likely benefits from Oppo’s established camera algorithms, known for vibrant colors and strong dynamic range. The Honor Magic Vs, while capable, may lean towards a more natural color profile. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the N3 Flip’s brand reputation in mobile photography gives it a slight edge. The inclusion of OIS on both devices is crucial for stable video recording and sharper low-light photos.

Performance

The Honor Magic Vs utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), while the Oppo Find N3 Flip is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (4nm). The Dimensity 9200, with its Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.05 GHz, offers a slight architectural advantage over the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 (3.0 GHz). This translates to potentially faster single-core performance on the N3 Flip. Both chipsets are built on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its excellent thermal management, potentially leading to more sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Both devices utilize Octa-core CPUs with similar Cortex-A510 efficiency cores.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find N3 Flip claims an endurance rating of 92 hours, surpassing the Honor Magic Vs’s 85 hours. This is further supported by the N3 Flip’s active use score of 12:58 hours. While the Magic Vs offers 66W wired charging, the N3 Flip’s 44W charging, reaching 50% in 23 minutes, is competitive. The N3 Flip’s superior endurance rating suggests more efficient power management, allowing for longer usage between charges. Both devices offer 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor Magic Vs if you need a larger screen for multitasking, content creation, or immersive gaming, and demand consistent performance under load. Its larger form factor is ideal for power users. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you prefer a more compact, pocketable design, prioritize battery life for all-day use, and appreciate the convenience of fast charging. It’s the perfect companion for social media enthusiasts and those on the go.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 in the Oppo Find N3 Flip exhibit thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200 is a powerful chipset, its thermal performance can vary depending on the device’s cooling solution. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s compact form factor may limit its cooling capacity, potentially leading to some throttling during extended, graphically intensive gaming. However, for typical gaming sessions, it should provide a smooth experience.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Honor Magic Vs and the Oppo Find N3 Flip?
Both Honor and Oppo have invested heavily in hinge technology for their foldable devices. The Honor Magic Vs utilizes a teardrop hinge design, while the Oppo Find N3 Flip employs a similar mechanism. Both are rated for hundreds of thousands of folds, but long-term durability will depend on real-world usage and environmental factors. Oppo has a strong track record with its Find N series hinges, suggesting a high level of reliability.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the Oppo Find N3 Flip significantly slower than the 66W charging on the Honor Magic Vs?
While 66W is faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times isn't massive. The N3 Flip reaches 50% charge in 23 minutes, which is quite competitive. The overall charging experience is also influenced by battery capacity and charging curve. The N3 Flip’s superior battery efficiency means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.