Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 2: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 edges out the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate thanks to its brighter display, faster charging, and slightly more refined design. However, the Magic Vs Ultimate offers a more durable hinge and potentially better software optimization, making it a strong contender depending on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, August 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 161.1 x 144.7 x 5.4 mm Folded: 161.1 x 73.9 x 11.2 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 262 g (9.24 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott UTG glass |
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1914 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.02 inches, 206.0 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable LTPO2 OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 12, MIUI Fold 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.6, 45mm (telephoto), dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Black, Gold |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | 22061218C |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 1300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1050139 (v9) GeekBench: 4368 (v5.1) GFXBench: 52fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Durable hinge design
- More compact folded form factor
- Potentially better software optimization
- Excellent build quality
- Slightly slower charging
- Display not as bright as Mix Fold 2
- Crease is noticeable
Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (67W)
- Premium design and materials
- Potentially better camera system
- Larger folded footprint
- Software can be buggy at times
- Price may be higher
Display Comparison
Both phones boast excellent AMOLED displays, but the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 takes the lead with a measured peak brightness of 1054 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's display is still vibrant and sharp, but lacks the same level of brightness. The Mix Fold 2 also touts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting exceptional blacks and vibrant colors. The Magic Vs Ultimate's display is known for its crease, which is present but generally well-managed.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both offer capable camera systems, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 is generally considered to have a slight edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Mix Fold 2's camera setup often includes a telephoto lens with impressive zoom capabilities. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's camera is still very good, but may not match the overall versatility of the Mix Fold 2.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. While the CPU clock speeds differ slightly (Xiaomi's A510 cores are clocked lower), real-world performance is likely to be very similar. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and effortless app navigation on both phones. Software optimization will play a key role in the overall experience.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with an endurance rating of 82h. However, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 2's 67W charging is significantly faster than the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's 66W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Mix Fold 2 can reach 100% in just 40 minutes, a considerable advantage.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for users prioritizing durability, a more compact folded form factor, and potentially a more stable software experience. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 is best suited for those who value a stunning display, faster charging speeds, and a slightly more premium feel.