Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs vivo X Fold2: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold2 takes the crown with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and the more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. While the Magic Vs Ultimate offers a compelling package, the X Fold2’s advancements in key areas make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | vivo X Fold2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, April 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mmFolded: 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 279 g (9.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (peak) 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 108˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | V2266A |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 1330 EUR |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Potentially more compact design
- Durable hinge mechanism (reputation)
- Good overall performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely lower display brightness
- Older chipset
vivo X Fold2
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- Brighter display
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Excellent camera system (expected)
- Potentially larger and heavier
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The vivo X Fold2 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1308 nits compared to the Magic Vs Ultimate's likely lower peak brightness (spec not provided, but generally lower than vivo). Both feature excellent foldable panels, but the X Fold2's brightness advantage makes it better for outdoor visibility. Color accuracy and refresh rates are likely comparable, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature high-end camera systems, but the vivo X Fold2 is expected to have a slight advantage due to vivo's reputation for excellent mobile photography and the newer image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor sizes) are needed for a more precise comparison, but initial impressions suggest the X Fold2 delivers superior image quality.
Performance
The vivo X Fold2’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable performance edge over the Magic Vs Ultimate’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. While both are powerful, the Gen 2 offers improved efficiency and raw processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Gaming performance will also be superior on the X Fold2.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold2’s endurance rating of 96h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the real differentiator is its charging speed. The 120W wired charging and 50W wireless charging are significantly faster than the Magic Vs Ultimate’s 66W wired and 5W reverse wired charging. The X Fold2 can fully charge in just 26 minutes wired, a massive advantage.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for users prioritizing a more compact and potentially more durable foldable design, and those who don't need the absolute fastest charging speeds. The vivo X Fold2 is perfect for power users who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and blazing-fast charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.