Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs vivo X Fold+: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X Fold+ edges out the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate thanks to its faster charging, superior wireless capabilities, and potentially slightly better camera system. However, the Magic Vs Ultimate offers a compelling package with a refined design and competitive performance, making it a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | vivo X Fold+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, September 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: AMOLED, 120Hz, 6.53 inches, 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4730 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | V2229A |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 1450 EUR |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Slimmer and more compact design
- Reliable performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Competitive price point
- Durable hinge mechanism
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited wireless charging capabilities
- Camera potentially slightly behind vivo X Fold+
vivo X Fold+
- Faster 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Larger and more usable external display
- Potentially superior camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Higher price point
- Larger and heavier than Magic Vs Ultimate
- Software experience may vary based on region
Display Comparison
Both devices feature stunning AMOLED displays with high refresh rates. The vivo X Fold+ likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to vivo's reputation for display quality, but the Magic Vs Ultimate's display is still excellent. The external screen size is a key differentiator, with the X Fold+ offering a slightly larger and more usable external display.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X Fold+ is expected to have a slight edge in camera performance, leveraging vivo's image processing expertise and potentially a more advanced sensor configuration. Both phones offer versatile camera systems with multiple lenses, but the X Fold+ might deliver slightly better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and effortless app navigation on both devices. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The vivo X Fold+ boasts significantly faster charging speeds (80W wired, 50W wireless) compared to the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate (66W wired). While both offer reverse wireless charging, the X Fold+'s 50W wireless charging is a substantial advantage. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the X Fold+'s faster charging makes it the winner in this category.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for users prioritizing a slimmer, more compact foldable design and a robust, reliable experience. The vivo X Fold+ is best suited for those who demand the fastest charging speeds, wireless charging convenience, and potentially a more advanced camera setup.