Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs Tecno Phantom V Fold: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate edges out the Tecno Phantom V Fold thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, faster charging, and generally more refined software experience. While the Phantom V Fold boasts impressive battery life, the Magic Vs Ultimate offers a more powerful and polished package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | Tecno Phantom V Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, April 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | Glass front folded (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 159.4 x 140.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 159.4 x 72 x 14.2-14.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 299 g (10.55 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.42 inches, 1080 x 2550 pixels, 431 PPI | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Black, White |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | AD10 |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 999348 (v9) GeekBench: 3963 (v5.1), 3748 (v6) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Faster Charging (66W)
- More Refined Software
- Generally Better Camera Quality
- Premium Build Quality
- Potentially Higher Price
- Battery life not as exceptional as Phantom V Fold
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Exceptional Battery Life (92h Endurance Rating)
- More Affordable
- Large Display Area
- Decent Camera System
- Slightly Slower Performance (Dimensity 9000+)
- Slower Charging (45W)
- Software may lack polish
- Build quality may not be as premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature foldable AMOLED displays, but the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is generally considered to have slightly better color accuracy and brightness. The Phantom V Fold's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term and doesn't translate to a significantly better viewing experience in practice. The Magic Vs Ultimate's external display is also often praised for its usability.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both offer capable camera systems, the Magic Vs Ultimate generally produces more consistent and detailed images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Phantom V Fold's camera is decent, but lacks the refinement of the Honor's.
Performance
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Phantom V Fold's Dimensity 9000+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Honor device. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease, but the Magic Vs Ultimate shines under heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Fold takes the crown in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 92 hours. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate offers good battery life, but doesn't quite match the Phantom V Fold's longevity. However, the Magic Vs Ultimate's 66W charging is significantly faster than the Phantom V Fold's 45W.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for users prioritizing performance, a premium feel, and a more established brand reputation. The Tecno Phantom V Fold is a compelling option for those seeking exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly entry into the foldable space, though it may compromise slightly on overall performance and software polish.