Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs Oppo Find N2 Flip: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate boasts superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Oppo Find N2 Flip shines with its exceptional display brightness and compact form factor. Ultimately, the Magic Vs Ultimate is the better performer, but the Find N2 Flip offers a more pocketable and stylish experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | Oppo Find N2 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | Plastic front (unfolded), plastic back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 166.2 x 75.2 x 7.5 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.2 x 16 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5 3.26 inches, 382 x 720 pixels, 250 PPI 800 nits (HBM), 900 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Astral Black, Moonlit Purple, Gold |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | CPH2437, PGT110 |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 490 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 773574 (v9) GeekBench: 3265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- More Traditional Foldable Design
- Good Camera System
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Display not as bright as Find N2 Flip
- Battery life slightly less impressive than Find N2 Flip
Oppo Find N2 Flip
- Exceptional Display Brightness (1039 nits)
- Compact and Stylish Design
- Excellent Battery Life (97h endurance)
- Faster Charging (50% in 23 min)
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000+)
- Camera slightly less detailed than Magic Vs Ultimate
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N2 Flip takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1039 nits, significantly brighter than the Magic Vs Ultimate. While the Magic Vs Ultimate has a good display, the Find N2 Flip's contrast ratio (infinite nominal) and brightness provide a more vibrant and visible experience, especially outdoors. Both offer excellent resolution and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a close contest. Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Magic Vs Ultimate generally produces slightly more detailed images, especially in good lighting. Low-light performance is comparable. Video recording capabilities are also similar on both devices. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need further investigation for a definitive winner.
Performance
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate holds a clear advantage in performance. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is more powerful than the Oppo Find N2 Flip's Dimensity 9000+, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. Both phones have ample RAM, but the chipset difference is noticeable.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N2 Flip demonstrates impressive battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 97 hours. While the Magic Vs Ultimate's battery life is good, it doesn't quite match the Find N2 Flip's longevity. The Find N2 Flip also charges faster with 44W wired charging (50% in 23 minutes), compared to the Magic Vs Ultimate's 66W.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for power users and those prioritizing performance and a more traditional foldable experience. The Oppo Find N2 Flip is perfect for fashion-conscious users who want a compact, stylish, and easy-to-carry foldable device.