Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs Huawei Mate X3: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate edges out the Huawei Mate X3 thanks to its slightly superior performance and potentially better software experience (depending on region). While the Mate X3 boasts excellent battery life and wireless charging, the Magic Vs Ultimate's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides a noticeable performance boost. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | Huawei Mate X3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2023, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 156.9 x 141.5 x 5.3 mmFolded: 156.9 x 72.4 x 11.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 239 g or 241 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | IPX8 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Kunlun Glass (cover display only) |
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 2224 x 2496 pixels (~426 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.85 inches, 197.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, 6.4 inches, 1080 x 2504 pixels | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | HarmonyOS 3.1 (China), EMUI 13.1 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) Cover camera: 8 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (B1I+B1c+B2a), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter |
| - | BDS Satellite Message | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4800 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5060 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Black, White, Violet, Dark Green, Gold |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | ALT-AL00, ALT-L29 |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 993592 (v9) GeekBench: 4283 (v5.5), 4512 (v6) GFXBench: 41fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Potentially better performance
- Refined foldable design
- Likely superior software experience (region dependent)
- Premium build quality
- No wireless charging
- Camera details are unclear
- Price may be higher
Huawei Mate X3
- Exceptional battery life
- Wireless charging (50W)
- Reverse wireless charging (7.5W)
- Sleek and premium design
- High peak brightness display
- Performance may be slightly less optimized
- Software experience can be limited (region dependent)
- Camera details are unclear
Display Comparison
Both phones feature stunning foldable displays. The Mate X3 boasts a measured peak brightness of 926 nits and an infinite contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting excellent image quality. The Magic Vs Ultimate likely has comparable brightness and color accuracy, though specific measurements are needed for a definitive comparison. The Mate X3's display might have a slight edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities listed, detailed camera specs are missing. We'd expect the Mate X3 to have a strong focus on image processing and potentially offer unique shooting modes. The Magic Vs Ultimate might leverage Honor's image processing expertise for vibrant and detailed photos. A full camera comparison would require extensive testing.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but slight variations in software optimization could impact real-world performance. The Magic Vs Ultimate's software (likely MagicOS) might offer slightly more aggressive performance tuning. Both should handle demanding games and multitasking with ease.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate X3 shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours. This suggests exceptional battery life. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the Mate X3's optimization could contribute to its superior longevity. The Mate X3 also offers 50W wireless charging and 7.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Magic Vs Ultimate.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a refined foldable experience. It's a great choice for power users and those who want the latest hardware. The Huawei Mate X3 is perfect for those who value exceptional battery life, wireless charging convenience, and a sleek, premium design. It's a strong contender for users who want a reliable and long-lasting foldable.