Honor Magic Vs Ultimate vs Honor Magic Vs: The Ultimate Foldable Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate edges out the Magic Vs thanks to its slightly faster processor and likely improved camera capabilities (though specifics are limited). However, the Magic Vs remains a strong contender, especially for those prioritizing exceptional battery life and a potentially more affordable price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate | Honor Magic Vs |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 23 | 2022, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 261 g / 267 g (9.21 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits |
| Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 - InternationalAndroid 12, MagicOS 7 - China |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black | Cyan, Black, Orange |
| Models | FRI-AN10 | FRI-AN00, FRI-NX9 |
| Price | About 1500 EUR | About 2940 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 831175 (v9) GeekBench: 3971 (v5.1), 4497 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Slightly faster processor
- Likely improved camera
- Premium build quality (assumed)
- 66W fast charging
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life may be slightly less than Magic Vs
Honor Magic Vs
- Exceptional battery life (85h endurance)
- Vibrant display
- Potentially more affordable
- 66W fast charging
- Slightly slower processor
- Camera performance likely inferior to Ultimate
- May lack some premium features of the Ultimate
Display Comparison
Both devices feature foldable displays, but the Magic Vs Ultimate likely boasts a brighter panel and potentially improved color accuracy. The Magic Vs's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but suggests strong contrast. Expect similar overall quality, with the Ultimate potentially offering a slight edge in brightness and vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are missing for both devices. However, given the 'Ultimate' designation, it's reasonable to assume the Magic Vs Ultimate features improved camera hardware and software processing. Expect better low-light performance and potentially higher-resolution photos and videos from the Ultimate.
Performance
The Magic Vs Ultimate has a slight CPU clock speed advantage across all cores (X2, A710, and A510). This translates to marginally faster performance in demanding tasks and smoother multitasking. While both use the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, the Ultimate's slightly tweaked CPU configuration gives it a performance edge.
Battery Life
The Magic Vs boasts an impressive 85h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Magic Vs Ultimate's battery capacity is likely similar, the slightly more powerful processor could result in slightly reduced battery life, though still very respectable.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is ideal for power users who demand the best performance and are willing to pay a premium. The Honor Magic Vs is a great choice for users who prioritize long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly foldable experience.