Honor Magic V vs vivo X Fold: The Ultimate Foldable Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both the Honor Magic V and vivo X Fold offer premium foldable experiences with flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance. The vivo X Fold edges out with faster wireless charging and reverse wireless capabilities, while the Magic V might offer a slightly more refined hinge and potentially better software optimization. It's a close call!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic V | vivo X Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 10 | 2022, April 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 18 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.4 x 141.1 x 6.7 mmFolded: 160.4 x 72.7 x 14.3 mm | Unfolded: 162 x 144.9 x 6.3 mm Folded: 162 x 74.5 x 14.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 288 g / 293 g (10.16 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~381 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 200.5 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6 | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Single | 42 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚, (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 42 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) Cover camera: 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 100% in 37 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4750 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Black, Burnt Orange | Black, Blue |
| Models | MGI-AN00 | V2178A |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | About 1300 EUR |
Honor Magic V
- More compact folded form factor
- Potentially more refined hinge
- Excellent display quality
- Flagship performance
- Slower wireless charging
- Limited reverse charging
- Camera versatility slightly behind X Fold
vivo X Fold
- Larger unfolded display
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging
- Versatile camera system
- Slightly bulkier folded form factor
- Crease potentially more noticeable
- Software optimization could be improved
Display Comparison
Both devices feature flexible AMOLED displays. The vivo X Fold boasts a slightly larger unfolded display (8.01 inches vs 7.9 inches on the Magic V), potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience. However, the Magic V's display might have a more refined crease. Both offer high refresh rates (120Hz) for smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X Fold generally has a more versatile camera system, often featuring a higher resolution primary sensor and a periscope telephoto lens for improved zoom capabilities. The Honor Magic V's camera is still excellent, but might not match the X Fold's overall versatility. Expect excellent image quality from both, but with slightly different strengths.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, both phones deliver flagship-level performance. Expect snappy multitasking, seamless gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal and depend more on software optimization.
Battery Life
Both devices have a similar battery capacity (around 4700mAh). The vivo X Fold's 66W wired charging and 50W wireless charging provide a faster charging experience compared to the Magic V's 66W wired and 5W reverse wired charging. The X Fold's reverse wireless charging is also a useful addition.
Buying Guide
The Honor Magic V is ideal for users prioritizing a more compact folded form factor and potentially a more robust hinge mechanism. The vivo X Fold is a better choice for those who value faster charging speeds, wireless charging convenience, and a slightly larger unfolded display.