Honor Magic V vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more modern design, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the winner. Its 10:12 active use score significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Magic V, despite the older chipset. However, the Magic V may appeal to those seeking a larger internal display and potentially faster wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Magic V | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 10 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 18 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.4 x 141.1 x 6.7 mmFolded: 160.4 x 72.7 x 14.3 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 288 g / 293 g (10.16 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~381 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.9 inches, 200.5 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 42 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 122˚, (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 42 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 15 min 5W reverse wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4750 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Black, Burnt Orange | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | MGI-AN00 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | $ 500.00 |
Honor Magic V
- Faster wired charging (66W)
- Larger internal display (likely)
- Established foldable design
- Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Bulkier form factor
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Superior battery life (10:12h active use)
- More modern clamshell design
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Slower wired charging (45W)
- Smaller internal display
- External display may be prone to scratches
Display Comparison
While specific display specs for the Honor Magic V are not provided, its 'book-style' foldable design suggests a larger internal screen aimed at multitasking. The Motorola Razr+ 2025, being a clamshell, prioritizes compactness. The key difference lies in the user experience: the Magic V offers a tablet-like experience when unfolded, while the Razr+ 2025 focuses on a convenient, pocketable form factor. Both likely employ OLED technology, but without nit brightness or refresh rate data, a direct comparison is difficult. The Razr+'s external display is a key feature, offering functionality without needing to unfold the device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Razr+ 2025 will likely focus on computational photography and software enhancements, leveraging the 8s Gen 3’s ISP capabilities. The Magic V, being an earlier model, may rely more on hardware specifications. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors, but without that data, we can only speculate. It's reasonable to assume both devices will offer a versatile camera system, but the Razr+ 2025’s newer image signal processor could provide an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 boasts the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), a significant upgrade over the Honor Magic V’s SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8s Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside four Cortex-A720 performance cores at 2.8 GHz, and three Cortex-A520 efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. This represents an architectural improvement over the Magic V’s X2 core and A710/A510 configuration. While both are 4nm chips, the newer architecture and higher clock speeds of the 8s Gen 3 translate to better sustained performance and efficiency, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Razr+ 2025 will likely exhibit less thermal throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s 10:12 hour active use score is a standout feature, indicating excellent battery optimization despite a likely smaller battery capacity compared to the Magic V. The Honor Magic V offers 66W wired charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Razr+ 2025 counters with 45W wired and 15W wireless charging, offering more versatility. While the Magic V charges faster initially, the Razr+ 2025’s superior battery life means users may not need to charge as frequently. Both offer 5W reverse wired charging for accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic V if you need a larger, more immersive internal display for productivity and media consumption, and if 66W wired charging is a priority. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prefer a more pocketable, stylish clamshell design, and if maximizing battery life throughout a full day of use is paramount. The Razr+ 2025 is ideal for users who frequently use their phone for social media, communication, and light gaming.