The foldable market is heating up, with the Honor Magic V Flip 2 representing the latest silicon from Qualcomm, while the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 aims to refine the established foldable experience. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two devices, focusing on performance, display quality, battery life, and charging speeds to determine which foldable reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and display brightness, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, and its brighter display enhances outdoor visibility. However, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 offers competitive battery endurance and slightly faster wired charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 21 | 2023, August 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 21 | Available. Released 2023, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Aluminum frame | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back or aramid fiber back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 167.1 x 75.6 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.2 x 75.6 x 15.5 mm | Unfolded: 161.2 x 143.3 x 5.3 mm Folded: 161.2 x 73.5 x 10.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 255 g or 259 g (8.99 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1232 x 2868 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) | 1916 x 2160 pixels (~360 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.03 inches, 206.5 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, Dolby Vision, BT.2020, 5000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO OLED+, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
10 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom
10 MP, f/2.9, 115mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm
Cover camera:
20 MP, f/2.3, 23mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, ASHA | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band (tri-band after future SW update) |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 42 min
50W wireless
5W reverse wired
Reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 40 min
50W wireless, 100% in 55 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Silver, Gray, Blue | Black, Gold |
| Models | CLE-AN00 | 2308CPXD0C |
| Price | - | About 1150 EUR |
Honor Magic V Flip 2
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset for superior performance
- Significantly brighter display (1786 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Faster wired charging (80W) for quicker top-ups
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- Limited camera details available for a full assessment
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- Excellent battery endurance (117h rating)
- Competitive charging speeds (67W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially more refined software experience due to longer market presence
- Older Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset offers less raw performance
- Dimmer display (1277 nits) may struggle in direct sunlight
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic V Flip 2 boasts a peak brightness of 1786 nits, significantly exceeding the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s 1277 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize advanced panel technology, the higher brightness of the Honor gives it a clear advantage for outdoor use. We lack information on panel type (LTPO) for either, but assume both employ it given the flagship status. Bezels are a critical factor in foldable design, and a hands-on comparison would be needed to determine which device minimizes them more effectively. Color accuracy is also unknown, but both brands typically deliver well-calibrated displays.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given the flagship positioning, we can expect both to feature multi-camera systems with OIS. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s camera is listed as having photo/video capabilities, suggesting a focus on versatility. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both will offer competitive image quality, but the Honor’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 could provide an edge in image processing and low-light performance. The absence of details on the 2MP macro cameras on either device suggests they are likely included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic utility.
Performance
The Honor Magic V Flip 2’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Gen 3 features a new CPU architecture – Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz versus the Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 at 3.36 GHz – promising improved single-core performance. The Gen 3 also benefits from architectural improvements in the A720 cores. While both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, the newer architecture of the Gen 3 should result in better efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Mix Fold 3’s CPU configuration (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) is slightly different, but the core architectural improvements in the Gen 3 outweigh these differences. The Honor will likely excel in graphically intensive tasks and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating strong battery life. The Honor Magic V Flip 2, with an active use score of 12:43h, translates to a respectable, but potentially shorter, battery life. However, the Honor compensates with significantly faster charging: 80W wired (42 minutes to 100%) and 50W wireless, compared to the Xiaomi’s 67W wired (40 minutes) and 50W wireless (55 minutes). The Honor’s faster wired charging provides a quicker top-up, mitigating any potential battery life deficit. The inclusion of 5W reverse wired and wireless charging on the Honor adds convenience for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Magic V Flip 2 if you demand the absolute best processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value a brighter, more vibrant display. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 if you prioritize all-day battery life and appreciate a more mature foldable design with potentially more refined software optimization, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Honor Magic V Flip 2 generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a powerful chip, Qualcomm has focused on improving thermal efficiency with this generation. The 4nm process and architectural optimizations should minimize throttling, but sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The Honor Magic V Flip 2’s cooling system will be crucial in managing this, and independent thermal testing is needed for a definitive answer.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Honor Magic V Flip 2 and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
Hinge durability is a critical concern for foldable phones. While neither manufacturer provides specific cycle testing data, Xiaomi has had more generations of foldable devices, potentially leading to a more refined hinge mechanism. However, Honor has a strong reputation for build quality. Long-term usage data will be needed to determine which hinge proves more reliable.
❓ Is the 50W wireless charging on both phones compatible with all Qi wireless chargers?
Both the Honor Magic V Flip 2 and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 support 50W wireless charging, but achieving that speed requires a compatible charger that specifically supports the Power Delivery (PD) standard and the appropriate wattage. Standard Qi chargers will likely charge at slower speeds.
